[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Revisiting high-level 3.1 goals

Justin Mason jm at jmason.org
Mon Jan 31 02:10:24 CET 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Daniel Quinlan writes:
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond at prolocation.net> writes:
> 
> > Please let us know what we should do, cutting out we should announce, the 
> > actual removal is just altering one export script...
> 
> Considering that SA hasn't shipped with JP yet and that those hosts are
> already caught in WS (which predates JP), I'd announce that you're
> making the change in a week and then make the change.

btw, I think requiring people to upgrade ASAP isn't necessarily a great
idea; we can avoid it by setting up a new BL for "WS minus JP".  then
3.1.0 can look up

    - JP
    - WS_minus_JP

and existing clients can look up

    - WS (which includes JP as before)

and upgrade at their leisure...

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFB/YWAMJF5cimLx9ARAsCpAJ9djZfXpjb5bnvqwVpB/DhWBj2ZJwCfSWUw
+04XkceKOdaxgxXAG6wXgLQ=
=QBtY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Discuss mailing list