[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Revisiting high-level 3.1 goals
Justin Mason
jm at jmason.org
Mon Jan 31 02:10:24 CET 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond at prolocation.net> writes:
>
> > Please let us know what we should do, cutting out we should announce, the
> > actual removal is just altering one export script...
>
> Considering that SA hasn't shipped with JP yet and that those hosts are
> already caught in WS (which predates JP), I'd announce that you're
> making the change in a week and then make the change.
btw, I think requiring people to upgrade ASAP isn't necessarily a great
idea; we can avoid it by setting up a new BL for "WS minus JP". then
3.1.0 can look up
- JP
- WS_minus_JP
and existing clients can look up
- WS (which includes JP as before)
and upgrade at their leisure...
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFB/YWAMJF5cimLx9ARAsCpAJ9djZfXpjb5bnvqwVpB/DhWBj2ZJwCfSWUw
+04XkceKOdaxgxXAG6wXgLQ=
=QBtY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Discuss
mailing list