[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Revisiting high-level 3.1 goals

Raymond Dijkxhoorn raymond at prolocation.net
Mon Jan 31 02:14:38 CET 2005


>> Considering that SA hasn't shipped with JP yet and that those hosts are
>> already caught in WS (which predates JP), I'd announce that you're
>> making the change in a week and then make the change.

> btw, I think requiring people to upgrade ASAP isn't necessarily a great
> idea; we can avoid it by setting up a new BL for "WS minus JP".  then
> 3.1.0 can look up
>    - JP
>    - WS_minus_JP
> and existing clients can look up
>    - WS (which includes JP as before)
> and upgrade at their leisure...

What about:

The seperate zonefile will contain both (WS+JP)

The multi list, since those seem to can use multi anyway, has the 
seperated sources.


More information about the Discuss mailing list