[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Revisiting high-level 3.1 goals

Jeff Chan jeffc at surbl.org
Mon Jan 31 02:47:02 CET 2005


On Sunday, January 30, 2005, 9:17:20 AM, Darrell (support at invariantsystems.com) wrote:
> Jeff,

> When this change occurs will the jp data be available as a separate list
> like jp.surbl.org or will it only be included in the multi?

> Darrell

We are very likely not making any more separate lists, and jp will
not be a separate list.  Therefore all SURBL applications should be
written to use bitmasking.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



More information about the Discuss mailing list