[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Please test sc2.surbl.org (and xs.surbl.org)

[Jeff Chan]

OK the prior rules were still wrong.  These will work:

urirhsbl  URIBL_SC2_SURBL  sc2.surbl.org.   A
body      URIBL_SC2_SURBL  eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe  URIBL_SC2_SURBL  Has URI in SC2 at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
tflags    URIBL_SC2_SURBL  net

score     URIBL_SC2_SURBL  3.0

urirhsbl  URIBL_XS_SURBL   xs.surbl.org.    A
body      URIBL_XS_SURBL   eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_XS_SURBL')
describe  URIBL_XS_SURBL   Has URI in XS - Testing
tflags    URIBL_XS_SURBL   net

score     URIBL_XS_SURBL   2.0

Lints just fine on our SA3 with A and no addresses or numbers.
(A is preferred over TXT.)

Note that we're using urirhsbl not urirhssub since sc2.surbl.org
and xs.surbl.org are standalone lists (for testing) and not part of
multi.surbl.org.

These lists will eventually go away as standalone lists, to very
likely go into multi instead.  Then you'll need to delete the sc2
rule and change xs to urirhssub and multi.  We'll send an
official announcement on the SURBL announcement list when this
actually happens: 

  http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/announce

Until then, please test sc2 and xs and let us know how they work
for you.

Jeff C.
--
Don't harm innocent bystanders.