[SPAM-TAG] Re: [SURBL-Discuss] A list of spammers urls

Chris Edwards chris at eng.gla.ac.uk
Fri Mar 11 13:33:45 CET 2005

Jeff Chan wrote:

| However of those 94, 92 appear to not resolve any NS records which
| means they're either not registered, had their registrations
| expire, revoked, etc.

So I take it you are not listing non-existant domains ?

( makes sense )

I wonder if there'd be much mileage in a SpamAssaassin feature to award
points for any URLs that don't resolve ?

Chris Edwards, Glasgow University Computing Service

More information about the Discuss mailing list