[SURBL-Discuss] Re: registrar boundary inconsistencies
jm at jmason.org
Thu May 5 19:16:39 CEST 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Chris Santerre writes:
> > - change the domain code in SA to consider the domain a registry like
> > eu.org or demon.co.uk (let us know and we'll change our code as long
> > as it makes sense ;-). This means we don't expect blacklist the
> > entire "registry".
> > - SURBL (or your data provider) blacklists the entire domain
> > - remove the hostname.domain listings ... why bother if nothing's
> > going to hit them
> I vote for changing the domain code to recognise these domains.
> Blacklisting the entire domain can have too many problems. Removing the
> whole thing would let spammers game these domains.
heh, I did say this would happen last year ;) I also think we should
consider these private registries equivalent to TLD registries, as I said
back then. Here's the bug -- it's still open:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Discuss