[SURBL-Discuss] SURBL Content
eric.smith at sage.com
Sun May 8 16:04:00 CEST 2005
XBL actually, very strange, I will check and follow up regarding it.
From: discuss-bounces at lists.surbl.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Chan
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 11:34 PM
To: SURBL Discussion list
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] SURBL Content
On Friday, May 6, 2005, 5:59:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> This morning we received a huge blast from a spammer that spamhaus.org
> identified properly but multi.surbl.org.rbldnsd didn't :( Just checking
> though :)
When you say spamhaus.org, which list are you referring to, XBL
or SBL? Because one of the new lists we're experimenting with,
xu.surbl.org, gets data from CBL spamtrap URI hits. CBL feeds
into XBL, and some of the XBL senders probably end up in SBL
Next time you see one like this, if you check it using the SURBL
it would be interesting to to hear if it hits the preliminary
version of the XS data.
Don't harm innocent bystanders.
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.surbl.org
More information about the Discuss