[SURBL-Discuss] Question about scoring in SA3

Kevin A. McGrail kmcgrail at pccc.com
Wed May 18 15:54:02 CEST 2005


Truthfully, I was looking for something a bit more conservative that still
reflected the possibility of a false-positive here and there ;-)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Spam Admin" <spam_admin at sil.org>
To: "SURBL Discussion list" <discuss at lists.surbl.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Question about scoring in SA3


> I have my rules set as this:
>
> score URIBL_AB_SURBL 50
>
> Thus, no matter what mode you are running in, SA scores this rule 50
points.  Put these in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or other .cf file in
this folder.
>
>
> Dan Zachary
>
>
>
>
> Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> >I've been very pleased with SURBL in SA3 and I'd like to increase the
> >scores.  However, I don't understand how the default scores like this
work:
> >
> >rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_AB_SURBL 0 2.007 0 0.417
> >rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_OB_SURBL 0 1.996 0 3.213
> >rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_PH_SURBL 0 0.839 0 2.000
> >rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_SC_SURBL 0 3.897 0 4.263
> >rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 0.539 0 1.462
> >
> >I feel SA is being too conservative with the resource that SURBL
provides.
> >Can anyone give me their recommendations for my local configuration file
for
> >replacement scores that will be more effective?
> >
> >And since I couldn't find it referenced, can anyone tell me what the four
> >numbers after the score mean?
> >
> >Regards,
> >KAM
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Discuss mailing list
> >Discuss at lists.surbl.org
> >http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.surbl.org
> http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



More information about the Discuss mailing list