[SURBL-Discuss] Help please - SA 3.0.2 and surbl

Kevin A. McGrail kmcgrail at pccc.com
Thu May 26 17:17:35 CEST 2005


What happens if you just DNS query the test points? Something simple like:

nslookup 2.0.0.127.multi.surbl.org

should return:

Name:   2.0.0.127.multi.surbl.org
Address: 127.0.0.2

or

nslookup surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com.multi.surbl.org

returns 127.0.0.2

or something real like nslookup 022shop.com.multi.surbl.org

returns 127.0.0.64 currently.

Regards,
KAM


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <roger-surbl-discuss at rope.net>
To: "SURBL Discuss" <discuss at lists.surbl.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:00 AM
Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] Help please - SA 3.0.2 and surbl


> I am trying to use SURBL with spamassassin 3.0.2 but, even though
> there seems to be an otherwise unusual length of time to process a
> message, it is definitely not picking up the
> http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com/ or http://127.0.0.2/ test URLs
> that I put into a test message.
>
> I use a local caching nameserver (djbdns).
>
> I invoke spamd with "-d -m5 -s local4 -u smtpd -x" and I have
> restarted the daemon.
>
> My /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre contains this line:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
>
> My /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf contains the following, with
> explanations afterwards:
>
> =========================================================================
> required_score                  12      # new
> #fold_headers                   0
> allow_user_rules                0
> report_safe                     0
> use_auto_whitelist              0
> auto_whitelist_factor           0
> use_dcc                         0
> use_pyzor                       0
> use_razor2                      0
> use_bayes                       0
> use_bayes_rules                 0
> bayes_auto_learn                0
> skip_rbl_checks                 0       # normally 1
> check_mx_attempts               0
> dns_available                   yes     # normally no
>
> # URIDNSBL - We don't want the standard URIDNSBLs to be used
> ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
> score URIBL_AB_SURBL            13
> score URIBL_OB_SURBL            13
> score URIBL_PH_SURBL            13
> score URIBL_SBL                 13
> score URIBL_SC_SURBL            13
> score URIBL_WS_SURBL            13
> #uridnsbl       URIBL_MULTI     multi-surbl.org.        TXT
> #body           URIBL_MULTI     eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_MULTI')
> #describe       URIBL_MULTI     Contains URL In MULTI Blocklist
> #tflags         URIBL_MULTI     net
> #score          URIBL_MULTI     13
> endif # Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
> =========================================================================
>
> Explanation: I am not using any of the features in the first part
> of the list as you can tell by the "0". In addition, I normally do not use
> any of the network features, so I have explicitly turned off all of the
> DNSBL checks by setting the scores to "0" for each of them. All I want to
> do is run SURBL and do some specific filtering.
>
> I have tried the URIDNSBL stuff two different ways. First, I had
> set the included tests to score "0" and used my own definition, then I
> changed it to what you see now, to use the stock definitions.
>
> Questions: Do I have something defined incorrectly? Have I missed
> a definition? Anything else?
>
> Thanks for any help.
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.surbl.org
> http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



More information about the Discuss mailing list