[SURBL-Discuss] Re: embedded image spams
jeffc at surbl.org
Tue May 31 03:02:40 CEST 2005
On Sunday, May 29, 2005, 5:27:44 PM, Sean Sowell wrote:
> Jeff C. wrote:
>> If you can post or send the timestamp of the message and the URI
>> domain of it, that would be great.
> Here's the list. My criteria for inclusion were that SA with default
> settings scored it < 5.0 (false negative), and the image(s) took up > 1/3 of
> the message body height.
1. Please don't use SA scores as an absolute indication of
spammyness. It's crucial to manually review the submissions
and not report legitimate domains like dell.com, directv,
walmart, etc. Please don't report those!
2. Please do continue to use SpamCop for reporting. Even in mole
mode, we get the URI reports.
3. But's it's crucial to NOT report legitimate domains. Frankly
the only domains I'm interested in blacklisting are the ones that
are advertised by criminal spam gangs, i.e. the ones usually
advertising viagra, porn, pirated software or mortgages, etc.
Don't harm innocent bystanders.
More information about the Discuss