[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Spam in progress bit ...
jeffc at surbl.org
Thu Aug 10 13:51:11 CEST 2006
On Thursday, August 10, 2006, 3:53:16 AM, opencomputing opencomputing wrote:
>>When was the last time Microsoft got listed in surbl ?
>>Smaller lists might end up being sent from a false positive domain and
>>the idea is that surbl test pattern
>>(queries/minutes, burst/continuous, historical comparisons, geolocation
>>and perhaps other metrics) should
>>allow to differentiate between such a list and a spam run.
> Spammers could add some fake URIs like yahoo.com, gmail.com,
> microsoft.com to their spam runs so that their mails get a hammy
> score(if surbl gives a negative score using some whitelisted URIs).
We don't use any negative scores anywhere. Our internal
whitelist is only used to exclude domains from blacklisting.
Don't harm innocent bystanders.
More information about the Discuss