jeffc at surbl.org
Mon Mar 6 20:52:56 CET 2006
On Monday, March 6, 2006, 11:07:33 AM, Theo Dinter wrote:
> Hey there,
> I was noticing in SpamAssassin dev rule files there's:
> urirhsbl T_URIBL_XS_SURBL xs.surbl.org. A
> body T_URIBL_XS_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('T_URIBL_XS_SURBL')
> it doesn't seem to be a used list, according to the SURBL website, but the
> results are semi-decent:
> 1.896 2.2832 0.0000 1.000 0.86 0.01 T_URIBL_XS_SURBL
> What are the plans for this list going forward? I'd like to either drop the test
> rule if XS isn't going anywhere, or promote it to an actual rule (preferably
> through multi) if it's going to stick around.
Processing on the list is currently halted, so the data are
mostly stale. When I get a chance to work on a new list, we
will probably test it as XS again and also call it that for
production. So in a nutshell it's stalled for now but may be
I will announce before we start up the list with any new data.
Currently I'm working out the inclusion parameters.
Don't harm innocent bystanders.
More information about the Discuss