[SURBL-Discuss] Why is multi's rsync file so large?

[Jeff Chan]

On Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 11:31:31 AM, Rob Systems) wrote:
> Why is multi's rsync file so large?

> Am I doing something wrong with my rsycn?

> I'm thinking that multi should be, at most, the sum of the parts of the other lists... In fact, it should really probably should be **smaller** than the sum of its parts because of MUCH overlapping
> data getting consolidated in multi.

> 01/10/2007  02:03 PM             8,883 ab.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 12/23/2006  11:53 AM           101,506 be.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 01/10/2007  02:12 PM         5,760,311 jp.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 01/10/2007  02:19 PM        75,027,410 multi.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 01/10/2007  02:11 PM         6,826,763 ob.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 01/10/2007  01:48 PM           330,910 ph.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 01/10/2007  02:11 PM         1,435,961 sc.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 07/09/2006  10:44 PM                 0 sc2.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 01/10/2007  01:03 PM         5,905,033 ws.surbl.org.rbldnsd
> 01/08/2007  03:44 AM               810 xs.surbl.org.rbldnsd
>               10 File(s)     95,397,587 bytes
>                0 Dir(s)  105,311,490,048 bytes free

% wc *rbldnsd
     554     594    8910 ab.surbl.org.rbldnsd
    6381    6421  101506 be.surbl.org.rbldnsd
  335873  335913 5760515 jp.surbl.org.rbldnsd
  680033 5440234 75030223 multi.surbl.org.rbldnsd
  407842  407882 6827183 ob.surbl.org.rbldnsd
   19350   19390  330926 ph.surbl.org.rbldnsd
   90971   91011 1436022 sc.surbl.org.rbldnsd
  346642  346682 5905033 ws.surbl.org.rbldnsd
      26      69     810 xs.surbl.org.rbldnsd
 1887672 6648196 95401128 total

Looks about right to me.  Would be nice if the files were
smaller, but the number of records (lines) is consistent.

Jeff C.
--
Don't harm innocent bystanders.