[SURBL-Discuss] RFC: significantly reducing FPs on OB
jeffc at surbl.org
Sun Jul 13 21:20:18 CEST 2008
On Sunday, July 13, 2008, 10:02:04 AM, SM wrote:
> If there are too many false positives, it's better to throw out the
> bad data at the risk of losing some good data. You can run a test
> feed to determine the effectiveness of each approach.
Which brings up a good point: does anyone have any current test
data about the OB list that they can share, i.e., false positive
rate especially compared to the other SURBL lists?
More information about the Discuss