Announce

announce@lists.surbl.org

187 discussions

[SURBL-Announce] numeric testpoints added: 2.0.0.127.sc.surbl.org, etc.
by Jeff Chan 13 Apr '04

13 Apr '04

At Eric Kolve' good suggestion, we've added numeric testpoints into the SURBLs: Name: 2.0.0.127.sc.surbl.org Address: 127.0.0.2 Name: 2.0.0.127.sa.surbl.org Address: 127.0.0.2 Those go along with the existing name ones: Name: test.surbl.org.sc.surbl.org Address: 127.0.0.2 Name: test.sc.surbl.org.sc.surbl.org Address: 127.0.0.2 Name: test.surbl.org.sa.surbl.org Address: 127.0.0.2 Name: test.sa.surbl.org.sa.surbl.org Address: 127.0.0.2 Cheers, Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org-nospam http://www.surbl.org/

1 0

Slashdot about SURBL
by Jeff Chan 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

Made Slashdot: http://slashdot.org/ A New Type Of Realtime Blocklist: The SURBL Posted by timothy on Monday April 12, @05:02PM from the chicken-egg-spam dept. Glamdrlng writes "The SURBL, or "Spam URI Realtime Blocklist", represents a nexus of RBL's and content filtering that may bring us one step closer to a spam magic bullet. While traditional RBL's perform a DNS lookup on the connecting mail server, SURBL's take this a step further by parsing the text of the email looking for URI's and doing a lookup on those web servers. They also prevent "joe jobs" by maintaining a whitelist of legitimate web servers whose domain names may show up in spam messages, e.g. EBay, Paypal, Microsoft, etc. The only requirement to implement the SURBL is a plugin on your MTA such as spamassassin that can parse the body of each email. While there is no MTA that directly supports SURBL's without a plugin, the author hints at one being in development." http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/04/12/1956252.shtml?tid=111&tid=126&tid=95 Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/

1 0

[SURBL-Announce] Re: [SURBL-Zones] sa.surbl.org TXT message shanged to add URI
by Jeff Chan 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

It may be worth mentioning that I fixed my typo in the text record. Or not. ;-) > On Sunday, April 11, 2004, 6:32:49 AM, William Stearns wrote: >> On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Jeff Chan wrote: >>> "Message body contains domain in sa-backlist. See: http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/" > >> Looks good, except sa-backlist needs another "l". *smile* > > Indeed it does. Fixed. Thanks! LOL! It now reads: "Message body contains domain in sa-blacklist. See: http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/" Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/

1 0

Lists archivess are available at correct URL
by Jeff Chan 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

Hi All, and Welcome to the folks who recently joined! Looks like the list archive links need a slight fix. Currently the URLs have the host as "localhost.localdomain" where that should be "lists.surbl.org" instead. Let me ask Raymond to please update that config in Mailman. :-) In the meantime all the list archives can be found at: http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/announce/ http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/discuss/ http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/zones/ Of perhaps special interest, please see and comment on the proposal on the discussion list for the second revision of the sc.surbl.org data engine which will resolve spam domains to IP addresses and prejudice future domain reports based on prior statistics for those IP addresses. (These IP addresses would only be used internally and the resulting hopefully-improved RBL data would still be domain-based. It does not represent a shift to a numbered RBL *for URI checking*, which I feel is a suboptimal approach.) I think this could be a very effective way to catch spam operations and spam ISPs with simply more intelligent use of the existing SpamCop URI domain data. That thread starts at: http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/discuss/2004-April/000002.html Frankly I think it's going to rock and would like your comments on it. Cheers, Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/

2 2

sa.surbl.org TXT message shanged to add URI
by Jeff Chan 11 Apr '04

11 Apr '04

I've udpated the TXT message for the sa list, addding a URI: "Message body contains domain in sa-backlist." to: "Message body contains domain in sa-backlist. See: http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/" This makes for a slightly larger BIND zonefile, but it's perhaps more descriptive. Comments please to discuss(a)lists.surbl.org . Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/

1 0

All three lists set to distribute plain text only
by Jeff Chan 11 Apr '04

11 Apr '04

FWIW I've changed all three lists to send out only plain text. I have no idea if that's standard practice in Mailman, but like most, ahem, experienced Internet users I prefer my mail messages as plaintext. And it was a simple change of the top default content setting, so I assume it's the most common switch used (after ~not filtered). Specifically Mailman will filter out any attachments that are not multipart/mixed, multipart/alternative, or text/plain, and convert any resulting text/html messages to plain text. Messages that have not recursively resolvable plain text are rejected back to the sender with an explanation, if I'm reading the Mailman description correctly. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/

1 0

surbl.com and surbl.net registered
by Jeff Chan 11 Apr '04

11 Apr '04

[re-sending on the more appropriate list] FWIW I just registered surbl.net and surbl.com to prevent doofuses from registering them and setting up bogus RBLs on them, as I recall happened to another RBL. Also set up an Apache redirect permanent for them to www.surbl.org, which remains the real domain and site. Cheers, Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Announce