Discuss January 2005

discuss@lists.surbl.org

38 participants
50 discussions

blocked, but still getting through?
by Martin 03 Feb '05

03 Feb '05

Hi, The following mail got through even though it's listed in SURBL (check the link in the middle of the message): crosswise is cd2 in moloch of democracy to bolshoi with anorthic. whack am frau going holyoke to 22844305 be brought the eye ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ Microsoft Windows XP Pro + Microsoft Office XP Pro -- $80 Adobe Photoshop 7 + Adobe Premiere 7 + Adobe Illustrator -- $120 Many other bundle and single offers too Copy and pase the link below in your browser: yahoo.durkee.knfhbfndkeMUNGED.info/?TRACKING-ID_CHANGED ************************************************************************ ************************************************************************ conception is 143983335 in ablaze cheap is a 136517095 of landmark into spinoff for adroit waterloo was cocoon in the muslin character was 45867360 in bimolecular Are they fooling SURBL by not include www or http? I've got several of these and wonder if i can do anything about this? Thanks / Martin

2 4

Re: Revisiting high-level 3.1 goals
by Jeff Chan 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

On Saturday, January 29, 2005, 11:29:28 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Jeff Chan <jeffc(a)surbl.org> writes: >> Can you give an estimate on when 3.1 is coming out? > Real soon now. OK, let's ask Raymond and Joe to remove the JP data from WS before your final pre-3.1 mass check. Should we do that now? >> One of the things we planned for it was to move JP data out of WS on >> the SURBL lists. > So, WS includes all of JP? Or, are JP entries individually considered > and added manually over time to WS? Or, is the problem something else? WS includes all of JP. They're simply added in right now. That's because 3.0.0 came out before you could add a separate rule for JP, and we wanted to get the benefit of JP into 3.0.0. Is there a separate rule for JP now? If not would you please add one? Jeff C.

8 24

SURBL DOS
by Chris Santerre 01 Feb '05

01 Feb '05

I just got a call from Jeff. www.surbl.org is under what appears to be a DDOS attack :) Wheeeeeee!!! Which means.......not much. It has no effect on the SURBL lists. All it does it slowdown whitelist requests, and make it difficult for people to read about SURBL :) And Jeff won't be able to reply to people right away. I'm sure Jeff will post when the storm is over. He already had a backup site half done, so this will be fixed soon. A big thanks to all the public mirrors of SURBL! You are what keeps this running!! Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE/SURBL Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin

4 4

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: Revisiting high-level 3.1 goals
by Daniel Quinlan 30 Jan '05

30 Jan '05

> BTW Any ideas when the last mass check for 3.1 might happen? No, but it'll be announced in advance. -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] I couldn't resist.....
by Chris Santerre 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:05 PM >To: SURBL Discuss >Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] I couldn't resist..... > > >On Thursday, January 27, 2005, 12:05:49 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote: >> Chris Santerre wrote: > >>> No comments from Jeff? I guess he doesn't like the mascot? :) > >> Maybe he doesn't know why you call this animal "Sir Bill" ;-) > >Yeah, I think I like Sir Bull better, but a Bull running >around the Sewers could give spammers a nice surprise.... ;-) > LOL I'm trying to think of some way to make a funny pic out of "Sir Bull"! It ain't an easy one! --Chris

2 1

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] RFC: remove zone files from SURBL web site
by Jeff Chan 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 8:30:00 PM, Darrell (support(a)invariantsystems.com) wrote: > I know a lot of Declude users are doing it that way. Someone wrote a batch > file thats coupled with wget that pulls the zone file down and creates a > Declude body filter. To be honest this is no longer needed since invURIBL > was wrote that plugs into Declude. Hmm, at least there is an upgrade path for doing it the preferred way with DNS through your newer plug in for Declude. > I just wanted to make sure that when a date was set that I posted that info > out to the Declude forum to let those users know. Can you let them know we will remove it at the end of January and they should use the newer plug in instead? Cheers, Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

2 1

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] I couldn't resist.....
by Chris Santerre 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

>-----Original Message----- >From: Doc Schneider [mailto:maddoc@maddoc.net] >Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:56 AM >To: SURBL Discussion list >Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] I couldn't resist..... > > >Chris Santerre wrote: >> http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/SURBL.jpg >> >> :) >> > >ROAR! HOWL! HAR! > >That is great Chris. > >-Doc No comments from Jeff? I guess he doesn't like the mascot? :) --Chris

4 3

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] I couldn't resist.....
by Chris Santerre 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

>-----Original Message----- >From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@prolocation.net] >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 1:36 PM >To: SURBL Discussion list >Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] I couldn't resist..... > > >Hi! > >>>> http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/SURBL.jpg >>>> >>>> :) > >>> ROAR! HOWL! HAR! >>> That is great Chris. > >> No comments from Jeff? I guess he doesn't like the mascot? :) > >Ohhh, wasnt it a picture of Jeff ? ;) > > ;) > >Bye, >Raymond. Did you just say Jeff was hung like a ........ oh my this is getting OT :) --Chris

2 1

False Positive report for ob.surbl.org
by Matt Yackley 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Hello, I received what I believe to be a false positive hit on the ob.surbl.org list, the following domain is listed: ohyeahcadMUNGED.com The URL was listed within the "CAD CAM CAE Newsletter" sent out by TenLinks Daily. This email was tagged as spam and submitted by the end user as a false positive. Cheers, Matt

2 1

Please use whitelist request address
by Jeff Chan 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

A reminder: please send whitelist requests and false positive reports to: whitelist at surbl dot org Thanks, Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss January 2005