On Saturday, October 18, 2008, 12:29:17 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> SURBL is looking for statistics about what portion of unsolicited our
> lists are detecting (ideally in large mail flows). An overall number
> would be ideal, as in what fraction of total unsolicited messages are
> caught by any SURBL list. One possible way to measure this from
> SpamAssassin-processed messages would be to count the messages marked
> as spam that had 'SURBL' in their scores versus the ones that didn't
> have a SURBL rule hit. The ratio would be the spams with SURBL hits
> divided by total number of spams.
I should have added, here is a SpamAssassin meta rule that may
show how many messages hit any surbl rule:
meta URIBL_META_SURBL_ANY (URIBL_AB_SURBL || \
URIBL_JP_SURBL || URIBL_OB_SURBL || URIBL_PH_SURBL || \
URIBL_SC_SURBL || URIBL_WS_SURBL)
score URIBL_META_SURBL_ANY 0.01
(For however the line wraps should be handled.)
Jeff C.