Discuss

discuss@lists.surbl.org

1864 discussions

Here it comes.
by William Stearns 13 Apr '04

13 Apr '04

Good afternoon, all, The slashdot effect is probably hammering surbl.org right now. Someone posted surbl.org to http://slashdot.org/ The slashdot comments aren't terribly positive - I have no problem with that. I figure I'll keep contributing as long as it continues to be useful. Cheers, - Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "NT 5.0 is the last nail in the Unix coffin. Interestingly, Unix isn't in the coffin... It's wondering what the heck is sealing itself into a wooden box 6 feet underground..." (Courtesy of Jason McMullan <jmcc(a)grits.visus.com>) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- William Stearns (wstearns(a)pobox.com). Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f, rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at: http://www.stearns.org --------------------------------------------------------------------------

4 4

RFC: New name for sa.surbl.org
by Jeff Chan 13 Apr '04

13 Apr '04

OK Looks like someone (lol I'm nominated, I guess) needs to put his foot down and set a new name for sa.surbl.org, our RBL version of Bill Stearns' sa-blacklist SA ruleset. I suggested "sb", though that's slightly confusing with sc. Bill suggested ws or sb would work for him. Does anyone else have any comments or idea? We should change this soon before too many people start coding in "sa.surbl.org". Please comment if you have any. ;-) Thanks, Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/

4 7

[SURBL-Discuss] Re: Simple install instructions for spamcopuri0.09 on Win32
by ITReading ITReading 13 Apr '04

13 Apr '04

I forgot to mention that my instructions are written from the point of view of a "Guinevere" (www.beginfinite.com) user and are written for users of Guinevere. However, I expect steps 1-7 to work on just about any Win32 implementation of SA (on ActivePerl 5.6.1). I hope this makes things a little clearer. Thanks! Charles >I have successfully installed SURBL support and have it up and running in my environment. > >I documented my procedures at www.aldridge-borden.com/surbl.html if anyone is interested. > >P.S. Jeff C, if you want to host this file somewhere on surbl.org, you certainly have my blessing. If its worth hosting. Even though >the instructions are really simple, they have been helpful to some Win32 users as they often aren't too Perl savvy (I'm one of >them!). > >Charles Solomon

2 2

[SURBL-Discuss] t/dnsrbl...........ok 4/6# Failed test (t/dnsrbl.t at line 25)
by Cal Evans 13 Apr '04

13 Apr '04

PERL Version 5.8.0 Everything seems to compile just fine but make test returns: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/bad..............ok t/blacklist........ok t/cache............ok t/dnsrbl...........ok 4/6# Failed test (t/dnsrbl.t at line 25) t/dnsrbl...........NOK 5# Looks like you failed 1 tests of 6. t/dnsrbl...........dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 5 Failed 1/6 tests, 83.33% okay t/good.............ok t/ipaddress........ok t/longhostname.....ok t/mailto...........ok t/merge_urls.......ok t/shorthostname....ok t/spamcop_fetch....ok t/spamcopuri.......ok t/whitelist........ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/dnsrbl.t 1 256 6 1 16.67% 5 Failed 1/13 test scripts, 92.31% okay. 1/63 subtests failed, 98.41% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 Make install works but spamassassin --lint fails on the spamcop rule: Failed to compile URI SpamAssassin tests, skipping: (syntax error at /usr/share/spamassassin/81_spamcop_uri.cf, rule SPAMCOP_URI_RBL, line 1, near "eval:" syntax error at /usr/share/spamassassin/20_uri_tests.cf, rule URI_OFFERS, line 175, near "; }" ) Anyone have any ideas? TIA! =C= * Cal Evans * http://www.eicc.com * We take care of your IT, * So you can take care of your business. * * I think inside the sphere.

2 1

[SURBL-Discuss] Simple install instructions for spamcopuri0.09 on Win32
by ITReading ITReading 13 Apr '04

13 Apr '04

I have successfully installed SURBL support and have it up and running in my environment. I documented my procedures at www.aldridge-borden.com/surbl.html if anyone is interested. P.S. Jeff C, if you want to host this file somewhere on surbl.org, you certainly have my blessing. If its worth hosting. Even though the instructions are really simple, they have been helpful to some Win32 users as they often aren't too Perl savvy (I'm one of them!). Charles Solomon

1 0

make test fail - SpamCopURI.pm line 117
by Jason Portwood 13 Apr '04

13 Apr '04

Greetings, I'm trying to install SpamCopURI and I've hit a snag on the make test Here's what I'm getting: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 -e 'use Test::Harness qw(&runtests $verbose); $verbose=0; runtests @ARGV;' t/*.t t/bad...............syntax error at blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamCopURI.pm line 117, near "$f :" BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/bad.t line 5. # Looks like your test died before it could output anything. dubious Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) DIED. FAILED tests 1-5 My perl version is: This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for i386-freebsd. I also installed the URI perl module that was needed. Any thoughts on what could be going on? I may just move on to SpamAssassin 3.0 with the 3.0 plugin and see if it clears up. Thank you, Jason Portwood jason(a)wkrp.com

2 2

Slashdot about SURBL
by Jeff Chan 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

Made Slashdot: http://slashdot.org/ A New Type Of Realtime Blocklist: The SURBL Posted by timothy on Monday April 12, @05:02PM from the chicken-egg-spam dept. Glamdrlng writes "The SURBL, or "Spam URI Realtime Blocklist", represents a nexus of RBL's and content filtering that may bring us one step closer to a spam magic bullet. While traditional RBL's perform a DNS lookup on the connecting mail server, SURBL's take this a step further by parsing the text of the email looking for URI's and doing a lookup on those web servers. They also prevent "joe jobs" by maintaining a whitelist of legitimate web servers whose domain names may show up in spam messages, e.g. EBay, Paypal, Microsoft, etc. The only requirement to implement the SURBL is a plugin on your MTA such as spamassassin that can parse the body of each email. While there is no MTA that directly supports SURBL's without a plugin, the author hints at one being in development." http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/04/12/1956252.shtml?tid=111&tid=126&tid=95 Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@surbl.org http://www.surbl.org/

1 0

Ok you asked for it - lol
by Paul Barbeau 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

I can not get this to work and i know this is a double post so sorry about that I am using OpenBSD and i update Storable in CPAN and when i run "URI::QueryParam" i get "is up to date" however i am still getting t/bad..............ok t/blacklist........ok t/cache............ok t/dnsrbl...........NOK 5# Failed test (t/dnsrbl.t at line 25) t/dnsrbl...........ok 6/6# Looks like you failed 1 tests of 6. t/dnsrbl...........dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 5 Failed 1/6 tests, 83.33% okay t/good.............ok

2 1

Re: Please sanity check sa.surbl.org announcement
by Daniel Quinlan 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

Jeff Chan <jeffc(a)surbl.org> writes: > Would you please do a spam and ham corpora check with > "sa.surbl.org" whenever you can? We'd really like to know any > false positives to remove if that's possible to determine. Pretty high FPs. OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME 11189 1200 9989 0.107 0.00 0.00 (all messages) 100.000 10.7248 89.2752 0.107 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) 6.095 56.2500 0.0701 0.999 1.00 1.00 URIBL_SC_SURBL 6.855 59.7500 0.5006 0.992 0.98 1.00 URIBL_SBL 9.545 72.8333 1.9421 0.974 0.95 0.01 T_URIBL_SA_SURBL 0.116 0.5000 0.0701 0.877 0.58 0.01 T_URIBL_DSBL The FP rate is higher than even SBL (which gets some collateral damage with URIBL due to the domain->NS->A method that focuses in on name servers). A few of my FPs are actually legitimate anti-spam domains. > We'd really like to know any false positives to remove if that's > possible to determine. Since the list is not regenerated every 4 days, I'm not sure it's a good idea for SA corpus maintainers to submit false positives since the FP rate would then be lower for us, but not much lower for most people. In other words, it would introduce a large corpus bias. > We deliberately did not want to combine Bill's list and mine not > so much due to not-invented-here syndrome but because their > source data is so different, and because their size and time > factors are pretty radically different at present. I gave some > of the original reasons in the proposed announcement which I had > not forwarded here yet, but will now. You could continue to offer separate queries for people who are mirroring the zones. A lot of blacklists offer both separate and multiple queries. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ and open source consulting

2 1

problems with SpamCopURI
by Russ Ringer 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

Hi I need some help with SpamCopURI. I made sure these modules were up to date: cpan> install LWP LWP is up to date. cpan> install URI URI is up to date. cpan> install Storable Storable is up to date. But I get this error with make test: # make test cp bin/spamcopuri-update blib/script/spamcopuri-update /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::MY" -e "MY->fixin(shift)" blib/script/spamcopuri-update PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/bad..............ok t/blacklist........ok t/cache............ok t/dnsrbl...........ok 4/6# Failed test (t/dnsrbl.t at line 25) t/dnsrbl...........ok 6/6# Looks like you failed 1 tests of 6. t/dnsrbl...........dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 5 Failed 1/6 tests, 83.33% okay t/good.............ok t/ipaddress........ok t/longhostname.....ok t/mailto...........ok t/merge_urls.......ok t/shorthostname....ok t/spamcop_fetch....ok t/spamcopuri.......ok t/whitelist........ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/dnsrbl.t 1 256 6 1 16.67% 5 Failed 1/13 test scripts, 92.31% okay. 1/63 subtests failed, 98.41% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 11 TIA for your help, -->Russ

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss