>...
>> 220 max.madplus.com ESMTP Merak 7.4.5; Wed, 18 May 2005 12:11:27 -0400
>> quit
>
>> Same registrant also owns gmbdream. com and uses the company name
>> of "GMB Direct".
>
>Thanks Paul. Does any of this help inform us about how spammy
>this critter is?
>
>Jeff C.
>--
>Don't harm innocent bystanders.
>
>...
There is the quick results from a Goggle search which shows that
"GMB Direct" runs a group of "…
[View More]email marketeering" companies/domains/sites
which vary in published policies.
A short list (just from the first few Google hits) include:
**** First a few "general" hits ****
Email Results: Permission Email Marketing Resources for Advertisers
www.emailresults.com/directory_ category.asp?CategoryID=4027
GMBDirect - Contact us
www.gmbdirect.com/en/contacts/
GMBDirect - About opt-in marketing
www.gmbdirect.com/en/marketing/
**** The first "really suspicious one" ****
... Bulk direct e-mail marketing services available through our partners GMB Direct.
... +Direct E-mail Marketing with our partners at GMB Direct. ...
www.flashcap.com/Main%20Site/ Services/Params/menu/100/default.aspx
**** Some "clear" slime ****
Sweeps-US.com - About Us
... COM is one of the family of Web sites owned and operated by GMB DIRECT.
Founded in 1998, GMB DIRECT is a leader within the online marketing industry. ...
sweeps-us.com/aboutus/
**** Uh-Oh - an "affiliate" program ****
Welcome to GMBDirect Affiliate Network
... 1-877-GMB-DIRECT. 1-877-462-3473. info(a)gmbtrack.com. Member Log In. Username :.
Password :. Publisher, Advertiser ...
gmbtrack.com/
**** Now more slime ****
Sweeps-US.com - About Us
... COM is one of the family of Web sites owned and operated by GMB DIRECT.
Founded in 1998, GMB DIRECT is a leader within the online marketing industry. ...
sweeps-us.com/aboutus/
**** Buy "opt-in" mailing lists ****
Optin Email Directory Directory - Business directory, Business to ...
... Email Marketing - National, Click to visit! GMB Direct. www.gmbdirect.com. New York,
New York. 877 GMB Direct. Click to visit! Targetware. www.targetware.com. ...
www.optinemaildirectory.com/s.asp?d=1478
**** Finally the "give-away" - true "slime" - the privacy page from a Russian
site they run (read the find print) ****
E-Get - Privacy policy
Privacy policy Last Updated: March 12, 2004. GMB Direct ("GMB Direct," "we," "us,"
"our") has created this site (the "Site") in order to advise you of GMB ...
www.vme.net.ru/Privacy/
Against them; Their contract specifically states they are not
responsible for the "correctness" of the lists. They will "rent" or "sell"
email address lists. They will willingly transfer data gathered from one
client to any other paying client (read the "privacy" statement). They
have an extremely large number of domains, many hidden with private
registrations.
In their defense; They are very expensive compared to many spammers.
They claim some large companies as customers. --- Thats it.
They make it seem like they are legit, but they offer to use any
customer provided list to email to (with no mention about "checking"). So
clearly they are in the "spam support" business but may have some legitimate
customers; Also, many of there domains are "hidden" with private registrations
and their seem to fall into three categories - the ones that say they are GMB
and are trying to sell services, the ones that say they are GMB but are for
gathering personal information using questionable "sweepstakes" (e.g. Win a
{TV, Gift Certificate, Sony VAIO, etc}) and other tatics, and finally the ones
which do not identify themselves at all. The mere existence if the third group
makes them slime (as does the second) and probably make them spammers for
themselves as well as for customers (this wouldn't stand up in court, but
probably would for a Grand Jury - You can decide where the decision should
fall). So the question of "how spammy" is still open, but "are they spammers"
is answered (i.e. you may want to list some domains, but not others).
Paul Shupak
track(a)plectere.com
[View Less]
Usually to the organization that is being misrepresented is a good place
to start. I know there are addresses set up just for this with some
companies, spoof(a)paypal.com and spoof(a)ebay.com come to mind. They might
not actually do anything, but they are there. :-(
>>> martin.lyberg(a)idkommunikation.com 5/19/2005 4:03 AM >>>
Where is the best place to report phishing-spam?
Thanks
/ Martin
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss(a)…
[View More]lists.surbl.org
http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[View Less]
>...
>
>On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 6:44:05 AM, Spam Admin wrote:
>> spam link.
>
>> http://www.kexmt.move.fresh-deals.net/go/g/31/2869/1/?3495564
>
>> Dan Zachary
>
>Hi Dan,
>This is a recently registered domain (a couple weeks ago)
>but it doesn't seem to resolve into spaces that are known
>to be spammy. That may just mean spammers have moved into
>a new network space, etc.
>
>However there are a number of odd things about this domain
…
[View More]>from the registration, to the host's registration, etc.
>And it doesn't seem to resolve currently.
>
>Is anyone else seeing this in spams?
>
>Jeff C.
>--
>Don't harm innocent bystanders.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
The actual registrant is below - have to do better to hide behind
a "private registration".
% jwhois madplus.com
[Querying whois.internic.net]
[Redirected to whois.enom.com]
[Querying whois.enom.com]
[whois.enom.com]
Registration Service Provided By:
Contact: abuse-ns(a)gmbdream.com
Visit:
Domain name: madplus.com
Administrative Contact:
Paul Davis (abuse-ns(a)gmbdream.com)
+1.6465363193
Fax: +1.-
60 E 42 Street
Suite 449
NewYork, NY 10165
US
Billing Contact:
Paul Davis (abuse-ns(a)gmbdream.com)
+1.6465363193
Fax: +1.-
60 E 42 Street
Suite 449
NewYork, NY 10165
US
Technical Contact:
Paul Davis (abuse-ns(a)gmbdream.com)
+1.6465363193
Fax: +1.-
60 E 42 Street
Suite 449
NewYork, NY 10165
US
Registrant Contact:
Paul Davis (abuse-ns(a)gmbdream.com)
+1.6465363193
Fax: +1.-
60 E 42 Street
Suite 449
NewYork, NY 10165
US
Status: Active
Name Servers:
ns1.madplus.comns2.madplus.com
Creation date: 15 Mar 2005 07:56:39
Expiration date: 15 Mar 2006 07:56:39
The data in this whois database is provided to you for information
purposes only, that is, to assist you in obtaining information about or
related to a domain name registration record. We make this information
available "as is," and do not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a
whois query, you agree that you will use this data only for lawful
purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (1)
enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that stress or load
this whois database system providing you this information; or (2) allow,
enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited,
commercial advertising or solicitations via direct mail, electronic
mail, or by telephone. The compilation, repackaging, dissemination or
other use of this data is expressly prohibited without prior written
consent from us. The registrar of record is eNom. We reserve the right
to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree
to abide by these terms.
Version 6.3 4/3/2002
Paul Shupak
track(a)plectere.com
[View Less]
>...
>> All DNS provided by:
>>
>> nserver: ns1.dnsm.net 218.7.120.70
>> nserver: ns2.dnsm.net 218.7.120.70
>>
>> And all domains registered to:
>>
>> owner: Roelf Van der Brug
>> email: admin(a)taiwanmedialtd.com
>> address: Singel 2
>> address: Jordaan
>> city: Amsterdam
>> state: --
>> postal-code: 1015JT
>> country: NL
>> phone: +31 …
[View More]84 220 2586
>
>We have seen fake registrations before, and this also fits there.
>Amsterdam is 020. not 084. The PO code fits Amsterdam however.
>
>domain: taiwanmedialtd.com
>status: lock
>owner: Mohammad Khan
>email: admin(a)taiwanmedialtd.com
>address: Kizilelma Caddesi No
>address: Findikzade
>city: Istanbul
>
>Funny, we have seen that also before.
>
>Bye,
>Raymond.
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
The postal code would be correct, if it was on land, but for the on
the docks (and this is a boat slip), the proper postal code is 1013JT.
Also, there are two variants of the Istanbul address, one has just
"No" at the end, the other is "No. 62" - It is actually a rug shop in the
bazaar. The "really" old registrations used taiwantelco. com as the email
domain and dnst. net for name service. (I have found over a hundred, before
I started using other people's data - from Joe Wein's, Bill Stearns' and a
few other peoples collected and published lists I've found a few hundred
more.) My favorite's are still the ones which use the address from the
Beverley Hills 90210 TV show (mostly a couple of months ago).
The most recent Turkish address, Pakistani telephone number, and email
they are using is (Note: there is a bazaar at Oguzhan Caddesi No. 1 that fills
the entire block - this address does not exist, but the telephone is a valid
mobile phone registered in Pakistan and the email is functional):
Gulhan Ozgur
Oguzhan Caddesi No:2 Kat: 2
Denizli
TR-20100
TR
+9.2582411726
magicgoodman(a)yahoo.com
Paul Shupak
track(a)plectere.com
[View Less]
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Steven Champeon [mailto:schampeo@hesketh.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 11:32 AM
>To: discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] yet another joe job
>
>
>
>Please list the following domains:
>
>dnbfbsqs.com SPAMMER
>ghtnsecn.com SPAMMER
>rumbumbale.com SPAMMER
>tnashbsv.com SPAMMER
>turuntale.com SPAMMER
All but one were already in uribl.com. I added the other ;)
Keep up the good fight Steven!
--Chris
Excellent thank you. I wasn't sure if the actual sites they were linking
were involved.
/E.
-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 11:25 AM
To: SURBL Discussion list
Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] German spam crap
Hi!
> So I saw the rule, but will any of the links in most of the messages be
> added to SURBL? It's my understanding this is virus related coming
…
[View More]> sometimes from internal hosts infected with a new class of virus that will
> turn the infected PC into a spam host. We do filter internal mail for
spam
> also so I thought I would check if the links in these messages will
> eventually make it to SURBL.
No, since the sites itself didnt do the spamrums, but were just abused
also. And no, thats not SURBL material...
>> http://mailscanner.prolocation.net/german.cf
>>
>> Ruleset to stop the Sober crap thats been going around like crazy
>> currently. The political spams written in german language...
>>
>> Hopefully it will help some people to stop this crap.
So get the ruleset if you wanna filter those.
Bye,
Raymond.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[View Less]
Hi!
Its mentioned on the SA list also, but since we got some questions about
it from other people who didnt read it there:
http://mailscanner.prolocation.net/german.cf
Ruleset to stop the Sober crap thats been going around like crazy
currently. The political spams written in german language...
Hopefully it will help some people to stop this crap.
Bye,
Raymond.
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Steven Champeon [mailto:schampeo@hesketh.com]
>> >Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 11:32 AM
>> >To: discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>> >Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] yet another joe job
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Please list the following domains:
>> >
>> >dnbfbsqs.com SPAMMER
>> >ghtnsecn.com SPAMMER
>> >rumbumbale.com SPAMMER
>> …
[View More]>tnashbsv.com SPAMMER
>> >turuntale.com SPAMMER
>>
>> All but one were already in uribl.com. I added the other ;)
>>
>> Keep up the good fight Steven!
>
>Can't really help not ;)
>
>More domains just came in today:
>
>aupd.com
>bnik.com
>c5t.net
>d3w.net
>da9.net
>ei7.net
>el9.net
>f5s.net
>g3r.net
>h64.net
>l73.net
>lzac.com
>mq5.net
>myyv.com
>nf0.net
>nlav.com
>pi11.com
>pq4.net
>pqer.com
>przc.com
>rgry.com
>t6i.net
>uosb.com
>vf9.net
>viags.com
>wlue.com
>xi4.net
>yi4.net
>ymil.com
>
>Looks like a completely different spammer. :(
>
>All DNS provided by:
>
>nserver: ns1.dnsm.net 218.7.120.70
>nserver: ns2.dnsm.net 218.7.120.70
>
>And all domains registered to:
>
>owner: Roelf Van der Brug
>email: admin(a)taiwanmedialtd.com
>address: Singel 2
>address: Jordaan
>city: Amsterdam
>state: --
>postal-code: 1015JT
>country: NL
>phone: +31 84 220 2586
>admin-c: admin(a)taiwanmedialtd.com#0
>tech-c: admin(a)taiwanmedialtd.com#0
>billing-c: admin(a)taiwanmedialtd.com#0
>nserver: ns1.dnsm.net 218.7.120.70
>nserver: ns2.dnsm.net 218.7.120.70
>created: 2005-04-21 14:11:39 UTC
>modified: 2005-05-09 10:20:38 UTC
>expires: 2006-04-21 10:11:39 UTC
>
>--
>hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
>join us! http://hesketh.com/about/careers/account_manager.html join us!
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
All taiwantelco/taiwanmedialtd - also uses addresses in Turkey and
telephone numbers in Pakistan. Look at the domain dnst. net for some
historic data. Many new domains are registered on a "Bay Drive" in
Beverley Hills - zipcodes 90210 and 90211 (no such street exists, except
on the TV show, it did) and some in New York and a few other places.
There is some relationship, maybe shared customers. Some of their
sites are hosted on the same machines as the multitrade group machines (see
the spamhaus records on both).
BTW. The 2 Singel address is a boat slip with no tenant (also the proper
postal code for the boat docks is 1013, not 1015). They just switched
registrars after Joker marked almost all of their domains as "invalid address".
See 900mg. com, aekb. com, b7x. com, cpko. com, dgko. com, and about a hundred
more.
Paul Shupak
track(a)plectere.com
[View Less]
So I saw the rule, but will any of the links in most of the messages be
added to SURBL? It's my understanding this is virus related coming
sometimes from internal hosts infected with a new class of virus that will
turn the infected PC into a spam host. We do filter internal mail for spam
also so I thought I would check if the links in these messages will
eventually make it to SURBL.
/E.
-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.…
[View More]org] On Behalf Of Kevin A. McGrail
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 1:06 PM
To: SURBL Discussion list
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] German spam crap
Thanks Raymond. I was wondering about that. It's been hammering a ton of
my mailing list subscriptions including sourceforge!
> Its mentioned on the SA list also, but since we got some questions about
> it from other people who didnt read it there:
>
> http://mailscanner.prolocation.net/german.cf
>
> Ruleset to stop the Sober crap thats been going around like crazy
> currently. The political spams written in german language...
>
> Hopefully it will help some people to stop this crap.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[View Less]
>...
>
>when browsing unsubscribe links like http://www.signoffcorp.biz/uns.htm to
>enter a spamtrap address I just noticed that quite a few of the pages look
>extremely similar, DNS lookups show:
>
>$ host www.signoffcorp.biz
>www.signoffcorp.biz has address 217.107.217.8
>$ host www.bestcds.biz
>www.bestcds.biz has address 217.107.217.8
>$ host www.wonder-pills.com
>www.wonder-pills.com has address 217.107.217.8
>$ host www.multimed.ws
>www.…
[View More]multimed.ws has address 217.107.217.8
>
>$ host 217.107.217.8
>8.217.107.217.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 8.0/27.217.107.217.in-addr.arpa.
>8.0/27.217.107.217.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer webrider.ru.
>$ host webrider.ru
>webrider.ru has address 217.107.216.26
>
>so i wonder if it is possible (or already done) to also list (and save) the
>IPs of URIBL listed domains and check newly queried, yet unlisted domains
>against those IPs.
>
>any comments?
>
>regards,
>
>wolfgang
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
All multitrade group - look at multitrade-corp. {biz,com}. Also,
you can lookup all those domains at rfc-ignorant.org for more comments.
BTW. You suggestion is the fundamental difference between IP based
BLs and RHS BLs - That is why there is a place in the world for both.
Paul Shupak
track(a)plectere.com
P.S. There are a least a few hundred domains at those IPs - I think there's
a partial list on one Spamhaus page (don't have the SBL at hand).
[View Less]
when browsing unsubscribe links like http://www.signoffcorp.biz/uns.htm to
enter a spamtrap address I just noticed that quite a few of the pages look
extremely similar, DNS lookups show:
$ host www.signoffcorp.bizwww.signoffcorp.biz has address 217.107.217.8
$ host www.bestcds.bizwww.bestcds.biz has address 217.107.217.8
$ host www.wonder-pills.comwww.wonder-pills.com has address 217.107.217.8
$ host www.multimed.wswww.multimed.ws has address 217.107.217.8
$ host 217.107.217.8
8.217.…
[View More]107.217.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 8.0/27.217.107.217.in-addr.arpa.
8.0/27.217.107.217.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer webrider.ru.
$ host webrider.ru
webrider.ru has address 217.107.216.26
so i wonder if it is possible (or already done) to also list (and save) the
IPs of URIBL listed domains and check newly queried, yet unlisted domains
against those IPs.
any comments?
regards,
wolfgang
[View Less]
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:34:13 -0700
> From: Jeff Chan <jeffc(a)surbl.org>
> Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] Feedback on adprofile.net wanted
> To: SURBL Discuss <discuss(a)lists.surbl.org>
> Message-ID: <357174725.20050509223413(a)surbl.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> adprofile.net reportedly appeared in a flowers.com ham as: ...
> Yet it's listed on WS by Bill Stearns. This may be a false
> positive. Does anyone have any more …
[View More]information about it?
I find adprofile.net within my corpus in
1) what appears to be a valid ham, angry (not quite hate) email to
Mike Malloy, liberal radio talk show host, from a radical conservative
listener. Email includes a copy of the 760thezone.com home page (the
radio station that carries the talk show). Home page apparently
contained the paid ad link:
<A class=3Dportalbar=20
href=3D"http://wvw.clearchannel.com/spacer.gif?event=3D104~radio~20~~124~=
Low Mortgage =Rates!~125~/hosts/index.html~121~kkzn-am~98~http://tx.adprofile.net/tx/r?=
CID=3D60584&M=3D0&sid=3Dlmr"=20
target=3D_blank><FONT color=3D#ff3300>Low Mortgage=20
target=3D_blank>Rates!</FONT></A>
In addition to that one ham, I have 12 spam.
Bob Menschel
[View Less]
>...
>
>adprofile.net reportedly appeared in a flowers.com ham as:
>
><td align="middle"><a href="http://tx.adprofile.net/tx/r?CID=12&M=3&sid=800ABC123"><IMG height=90
>src="http://a1234.g.akamai.net/f/1233/1234/1a/www.1800flowers.com/800f_assets/im… me
>too120X90.gif" width="120" NOSEND="1" border="0"></a></td>
>
>Yet it's listed on WS by Bill Stearns. This may be a false
>positive. Does anyone have any more information …
[View More]about it?
>
>Catherine Hampton says it's not on her spam radar and others
>have said that they may be web spammers on guestbooks, wikis,
>etc. but not email spammers. They seem to have some minor
>NANAS.
>
>Feedback wanted. :-)
>
>Jeff C.
>--
>Don't harm innocent bystanders.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
Slime, but not an email spammer to my knowledge - They do redirect
you (always) through portland.co. uk, who is slime also (and worse, but
still not an email spammer as far as I know). BTW, they both will gladly
sell your name, email address and IP (and probably whatever else they can
collect).
Chris, if your reading this, you should now have two more "grey"
entries for URIBL; But these both seem like FPs for SURBL.
Paul Shupak
track(a)plectere.com
P.S. This is probaly the wrond list, but for those using URIBL, what scores
are you using (mine are pretty low)? Reply on the URIBL list if it seems
more appropriate (likely it is).
[View Less]
Has anyone seen any spams that use two (or more) messages to catch the
recipient's eye?
E.g.: The first message has cutesy CSS-obfuscated text and maybe a
graphic or two, and informs/commands the user to watch for the follow-up
email from the same person and with a certain given catchphrase in the
subject line
The second followup message that arrives a minute or two later is
perhaps marked with an identical From: name (but not an identical from
address), and perhaps the prophesied …
[View More]catchphrase in the subject line.
The payload (a URL or phone number or whatever), would be in the body or
even subject line of the email message.
Comments?
[View Less]
[off list reply published with Eric's permission]
On Monday, May 9, 2005, 9:33:12 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Found out this morning it was an error in the way we were reporting file
> times. Everything is good now. We were piping modified times out to an
> HTML page every hour then we check if the page had changed at all in the
> last 12 hours.
> /E.
Cool. BTW if you want to know the actual timestamp of the data,
the best way is to look at the zone file serial number. Those
…
[View More]are generated from the number of epoch seconds at UTC when the
file is created. For example:
% dig multi.surbl.org soa
[...]
multi.surbl.org. 15M IN SOA a.surbl.org. zone.surbl.org. (
1115680902 ; serial
10M ; refresh
5M ; retry
1W ; expiry
15M ) ; minimum
% % date -u -r 1115680902
Mon May 9 23:21:42 UTC 2005
Jeff C.
--
Don't harm innocent bystanders.
[View Less]
Because they don't take to kindly to anyone doing tons of whois looksups an
hour. Trust me ;)
--Chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matthew Wilson [mailto:matthew@boomer.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 9:44 AM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] newly registered domains
>
>
>Why not integrate a whois date lookup directly into SURBL or URIBL?
>Design an encoding system whereby
>suspectedspammydomain.spammertld.dr.surbl.org (or uribl.com)…
[View More] would
>return the date somehow regex encoded in the IP address. Then write a
>nice SA rule that decodes it, also using regex. Are there any regex
>geniuses out there that could encode a date in an IP address?
>
>-Matthew
>
>
>> Well this has been brought up before. It is a very good idea,
>> however difficult to implement. Unfortunetly the date
>> returned by a whois querey comes in a wide variety of
>> flavors. We (SARE) thought we had all of the returned date
>> codes figured out. Nope. New ones still keep coming.
>>
>> uribl.com has some ideas on how to attack this very issue,
>> but not sure it is worth it yet.
>>
>> In short, it would be wonderful to start doing whois lookups
>> for every domain in an email. Lots of things could be flagged
>> off of it. Think of a sort of baysien whois DB. But the
>> traffic would be pretty dam big.
>>
>> --Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>> http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
[View Less]
Exactly, and do you have any idea how many of the lookups would be needed
per day? I do! Enough to get the uribl dns ip doing the lookups, blocked
from the whois servers.
People running the whois servers don't really play nice with others. You
need to approach them very carefully. APNIC is not going to be to helpful ;)
--Chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matthew Wilson [mailto:matthew@boomer.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:29 PM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>…
[View More]Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] newly registered domains
>
>
>I wasn't talking about doing huge numbers of whois lookups; I
>was saying
>cache the whois lookups in the a uribl dns zone, encoded using regex.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org
>> [mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Chris Santerre
>> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 9:20 AM
>> To: 'SURBL Discussion list'
>> Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] newly registered domains
>>
>> Because they don't take to kindly to anyone doing tons of
>> whois looksups an hour. Trust me ;)
>>
>> --Chris
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Matthew Wilson [mailto:matthew@boomer.com]
>> >Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 9:44 AM
>> >To: SURBL Discussion list
>> >Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] newly registered domains
>> >
>> >
>> >Why not integrate a whois date lookup directly into SURBL or URIBL?
>> >Design an encoding system whereby
>> >suspectedspammydomain.spammertld.dr.surbl.org (or uribl.com) would
>> >return the date somehow regex encoded in the IP address.
>> Then write a
>> >nice SA rule that decodes it, also using regex. Are there
>any regex
>> >geniuses out there that could encode a date in an IP address?
>> >
>> >-Matthew
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
[View Less]