Discuss

discuss@lists.surbl.org

2 participants
1870 discussions

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] ya.com likely FP in WS
by Chris Santerre 06 Aug '04

06 Aug '04

Don't see it in my submissions. Just a few other domains ending like that. shaveyaMUNGED.com and such. --Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] >Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 7:46 AM >To: SURBL Discussion list >Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] ya.com likely FP in WS > > >On Friday, August 6, 2004, 4:36:33 AM, Patrik Nilsson wrote: >> ya.com is listed in WS. > >> I can't find any recent NANAS reports where the domain is >used in uri's. >> They seem to be an ISP, with the domain showing up in >footers in legit mail >> when their webmail service is used. > >Thanks for the heads up. Looks like a legitimate, old (1995) ISP. >I've whitelisted it. > >WS folks, please find a way to keep ones like this off the list. > >Thanks, > >Jeff C. > >_______________________________________________ >Discuss mailing list >Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org >http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Errors with spamassassin --lint
by Mailing List 06 Aug '04

06 Aug '04

Hi Erik, Ignoring the Conf.pm in my "download repository" and in "cpan's download repository /root/.cpan/build) I see the 2 following Conf.pm files: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm So I guess I could nuke Conf.pm and PerMsgStatus.pm in 5.8.0 and it should be OK? Thanks Guy -----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kolve Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:08 To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Errors with spamassassin --lint It looks like you have two Conf.pm files floating around. Do a locate for 'Conf.pm', you probably have one from a previous perl install or SpamCopURI is going into the wrong place. You are looking for a directory that only has Conf.pm, PerMsgStatus.pm and SpamCopURI.pm. Remove all those files and try re-installing. --eric

2 1

Why is this?
by Doc Schneider 06 Aug '04

06 Aug '04

Why is MUNGED-m150.com being hit in SURBLs? I have one person on a list I host here who is always being tossed into spam for having their website over there. I suspect, since they're a free website provider, a lot of spamasshats use them. So can see why it is a questionable site. Is there anyway I can whitelist that site so it doesn't get caught by SURBL? Thanks, -Doc (D-Ninja)

2 4

Lag in multi.surbl.org
by ITReading ITReading 06 Aug '04

06 Aug '04

Please post when this is sorted out. Is the lag significant enough that I should consider switching back to the individual lists for everything except [ph]? Thanks in advance, Charles >Copied from <spamassassin-users(a)incubator.apache.org> >On Thursday, August 5, 2004, 2:50:59 PM, Nels Lindquist wrote: >> Is the multi.surbl.org synchronised dynamically to the individual >> lists, or is there some lag? >Yes, the source data in multi is generated at the same time as >the individual lists. The problem is that we currently have a >longish negative caching TTL on multi, which are are trying >to reduce to cut down on some of this lag that you noticed. >We hope to have it sorted out soon. >Jeff C. >-- >Jeff Chan >mailto:jeffc@surbl.org >http://www.surbl.org/

2 1

CPAN question
by Robert Leonard 05 Aug '04

05 Aug '04

This may be a total Newbie mistake.. But when I try to use CPAN to Install::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI it says I am up to date (I have version 19).. Likewise when I try to update SpamAssassin itself it also says it's up to day.. (I have 2.63).. Is there a way to refresh the list of what is current vs. what I have? Thanks!!!!!!

3 2

ANNOUNCE: Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI 0.22
by Eric Kolve 05 Aug '04

05 Aug '04

SpamCopURI 0.22 has been released. This fixes any incompatibilities 2.64 users may have seen when trying to install. 0.22 Thu Aug 5 13:09:15 PDT 2004 - Updated Makefile.pl to support 2.64 and including PerMsgStatus.pm from 2.64 release. Install process now figures out what version you have and installs correct patched version of PerMsgStatus.pm. SpamCopURI now supports both 2.63 and 2.64 version of SA. Package is on both sourceforge and CPAN: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/ --eric

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Whitelist Request
by Chris Santerre 05 Aug '04

05 Aug '04

Nothing here. I only show entries for anythingmilitaryMUNGED.com and hotgaymilitaryMUNGED.com :) --Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] >Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 8:28 PM >To: SURBL Discussion list >Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Whitelist Request > > >On Wednesday, August 4, 2004, 4:48:22 PM, Bitz Bitz wrote: >> We have customers subscribed to their mailing list :) >> Please whitelist military.com (listed at ws.surbl.org) > >Thanks. I've whitelisted across all SURBLs. > >ws folks, please find out how this got on the list and >see if we can eliminate a class of these. > >Jeff C. > >_______________________________________________ >Discuss mailing list >Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org >http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >

1 0

ANNOUNCE: Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI 0.21
by Eric Kolve 05 Aug '04

05 Aug '04

Just released SpamCopURI 0.21: 0.21 Wed Aug 4 16:41:31 PDT 2004 - Defaulting config param spamcop_uri_limit to 20. If the number of URLs in a message exceeds the limit, they are shuffled and only up to the number specified for the limit are tested. - New syntax for specifying the address match for multi.surbl.org: Instead of '127.0.0.0/2' use '127.0.0.0+2' this is being done to eliminate any confusion with CIDR syntax. The old '/' syntax is still supported, but will be deprecated in a future version. http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/ Package has also been upload to CPAN as well. --eric

4 5

Errors with spamassassin --lint
by Daniel J McDonald 05 Aug '04

05 Aug '04

> On Thursday, August 5, 2004, 4:39:58 AM, Jeff Chan wrote: > > On Thursday, August 5, 2004, 4:12:23 AM, Mailing List wrote:>> > Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:>> > open_redirect_list_spamcop_uri tinyurl.com > *.tinyurl.com>> Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, > skipping:>> open_redirect_list_spamcop_uri xurl.us > Er, the redirect tests failing may be ok, but I'm not so sure > about the eval ones. Can anyone else help? I had to remove my old /etc/mail/spamassassin/spamcop_uri.cf in order to upgrade to SA 2.64, then install the new spamcop_uri 0.21 and copy the new rules/spamcop_uri.cf from the distribution to /etc/mail/spamassassin/ in order for --lint to be happy. -- Daniel J McDonald <dan.mcdonald(a)austinenergy.com> Austin Energy

1 0

[SURBL-Discuss] jwSpamSpy domains in ws.surbl.org reduced to only the best ones
by Jeff Chan 05 Aug '04

05 Aug '04

Joe Wein has created a new version of the data which Raymond is putting into ws.surbl.org. The new version is 60% smaller and contains only domains that were added under an extensive and strict set of criteria which Joe devised. As a result, the jw additions to ws are 60% smaller and probably a lot better in terms of false positives. The earlier cut of the data had included some domains which Joe had seeded from other RBLs and which therefore did not have the extensive checking which Joe's current process applies to new entries. Joe used the seeding from other RBLs to initially populate his data, but the new data gathered purely with his own processing should be much better. Bottom line is that the FP rate of WS should drop. Does anyone have any current FP rates to share? Jeff C.

5 6

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss