group.to points to opt.to which I *think* is a redir.
??????
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.comhttp://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
More to acompany the sudden upsurge of FP's in the WS list.
meredith.com (magazine publisher - owner of americanbaby.com newsletter)
websponsors.combe3a.com
This week has been a particularly bad week for FP's :(
--
Regards,
David Hooton
Hello!
I'm trying to install SpamCopURI veriosn 0.18 on my YellowDog Linux server.
When I install a .cf file that calls it, I get the following messages from
spamassassin --lint :
[root@merlin spamassassin]# spamassassin --lint
Failed to compile URI SpamAssassin tests, skipping:
(syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/surbl.cf, rule WS_URI_RBL,
line 1, near "eval:"
syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf, rule BigEvilList_1614,
line 11071, near ";
}"
)
I've installed the same version of SpamCopURI on a RedHat 7.3 server
without any problems. I took the .cf file from that machine and it still
fails. The .cf file looks like this :
uri WS_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('ws.surbl.org','127.0.0.2')
describe WS_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in sa-blacklist
tflags WS_URI_RBL net
score WS_URI_RBL 3.0
Any thoughts ? I tried removing all my other .cf files and I still get ...
[root@merlin Mail-SpamAssassin-SpamCopURI-0.18]# spamassassin --lint
Failed to compile URI SpamAssassin tests, skipping:
(syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/surbl.cf, rule WS_URI_RBL,
line 1, near "eval:"
syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/surbl.cf, rule WS_URI_RBL, line 23,
near ";
}"
)
Thanks!
Michael
--
--------------------------------o---------------------------------
Michael H. Martel | Vermont State Colleges
martelm(a)quark.vsc.edu | Systems Administrator
http://probe.vsc.edu/~michael | PH:802-241-2544 FX:802-241-3363
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David B Funk [mailto:dbfunk@engineering.uiowa.edu]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 6:05 PM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] FP for images.meredith.com in ws.surbl.org ?
>
>
>My boss subscribes to the "WOOD ONLINE" woodworking newsletter
><newsletter(a)email.woodmall.com>, which is published by
>Meredith Corporation.
>
>It contains references to images from http://images.meredith.com
>which trigger hits from ws.surbl.org and BigEvil.cf
>(it survived the single hit from BigEvil but when I deployed
>SURBL it got taken down, then the boss was asking why his
>newsletter was landing in his spam-basket ;).
>
>Now that I know about it, I've whitelisted the newsletter but not
>sure what else might be hit.
>Is images.meredith.com truely evil or a FP?
>(I can supply a copy of the newsletter if anybody wants to see it).
>
>Dave
This is an interesting one. Of the only 2 recent ones I see, one was a
poison attempt:
http://tinyurl.com/2mzf6
And the other looked like legit spam:
http://tinyurl.com/2an9j
But who knows? I definetly don't see any pattern like I do with real spam.
I'm thinking they may be okay to remove. Anyone else?
--Chris
My boss subscribes to the "WOOD ONLINE" woodworking newsletter
<newsletter(a)email.woodmall.com>, which is published by
Meredith Corporation.
It contains references to images from http://images.meredith.com
which trigger hits from ws.surbl.org and BigEvil.cf
(it survived the single hit from BigEvil but when I deployed
SURBL it got taken down, then the boss was asking why his
newsletter was landing in his spam-basket ;).
Now that I know about it, I've whitelisted the newsletter but not
sure what else might be hit.
Is images.meredith.com truely evil or a FP?
(I can supply a copy of the newsletter if anybody wants to see it).
Dave
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
I know that netwinsite.com has been forged into a slew of "Mobster I.
Syphilitic" spams, as a bogus Received: header, but I would not block
mail simply based on the domain.
Chris Pugmire <chrisphome(a)netwin.co.nz> is the contact I worked with
over at Surgweb to clear up the forged Received: headers issue. He was
very antispam when I talked to him, perhaps he would be interested to
know if he's got some spamming customer(s).
--
hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
Buy "Cascading Style Sheets: Separating Content from Presentation, 2/e" today!
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059231X/heskecominc-20/ref=nosim/
Hello,
myfamily.com is present at ds list. It seems to me that this is
a false positive.
Jose-Marcio
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jose Marcio MARTINS DA CRUZ Tel. :(33) 01.40.51.93.41
Ecole des Mines de Paris http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr
60, bd Saint Michel http://www.ensmp.fr/~martins
75272 - PARIS CEDEX 06 mailto:Jose-Marcio.Martins@ensmp.fr
Could be a wakeup call for them. Maybe they should stop hosting spammers?
Yeah yeah I know. I'm removing them now :)
--Chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Patrik Nilsson [mailto:patrik@patrik.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 9:47 AM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] 8m.com FP? in ds and ws.
>
>
>8m.com seem to be used for sub-domain delegation.
>
>While some of those subdomains might be used in spam, not all
>are, so maybe
>8m.com should be white-listed and just the subdomains be listed?
>
>It's currently listed in ds and ws.
>
>Patrik
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>