On Sunday, April 11, 2004, 12:29:43 AM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Also, it would be better from our perspective if we could get multiple
> RBL results from a single query to reduce overhead. Any of multiple A
> (like NJABL, SBL/XBL, or SORBS), bitmask A (like OPM or RBL+), or
> multiple TXT (like SBL/XBL) would probably not be too hard to support
> (Justin?).
Dooh, I think I just realized you were asking whether multiple
RBLs could be supported from a single query inside SA, and not
whether we could combine the lists on the RBL side. Pardon my
misinterpretation if that was your original meaning.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org-nospam
http://www.surbl.org/
Jeff Chan <jeffc(a)surbl.org> wrote ..
> FWIW I just registered surbl.net and surbl.com to prevent
> doofuses from registering them and setting up bogus RBLs on
> them, as I recall happened to another RBL.
>
> Also set up an Apache redirect permanent for them to
> www.surbl.org, which remains the real domain.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff C.
>
Awesome Jeff.
I always registered the big three for all my domains too.
Might also want to considering grabbing surbl.us seems more and more folks are geting those too.
-Doc
FWIW I just registered surbl.net and surbl.com to prevent
doofuses from registering them and setting up bogus RBLs on
them, as I recall happened to another RBL.
Also set up an Apache redirect permanent for them to
www.surbl.org, which remains the real domain.
Cheers,
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/