Discuss

discuss@lists.surbl.org

1862 discussions

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] [question] my own surbl list?
by List Mail User 09 Jun '05

09 Jun '05

>... >Hello, all. > >I have operated SA 3.0.x with surbl.SURBL is best for me. >and I would like to make my own surbl list for some reason. > >So I added zone below. but it seems that this doesn't work. > > zone "my.surbl.org" { > type master; > file "surbl/my.surbl.org.bind"; > }; > >and added like below at 25_uribl.cf. > >urirhssub URIBL_MY_SURBL my.surbl.org. A 32 >body URIBL_MY_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_MY_SURBL') >describe URIBL_MY_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the MY SURBL >blocklist >tflags URIBL_MY_SURBL net > > >What's the problem? > >Thanks in advance. > >What's > >_________________________________________________________________ >ºžŽÙ ºüž£°í ºž±â ÆíÇÑ Žºœº. ¿ÀŽÃÀÇ ÈÁŠŽÂ MSN Žºœº¿¡Œ È®ÀÎÇÏŒŒ¿ä. >http://www.msn.co.kr/news/ > >_______________________________________________ >Discuss mailing list >Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org >http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > Two problems that probably won't answer your question. 1) You should not try to be authoritative for a subdomain of someone else's domain (i.e. surbl.org) unless they delegate it to you. In other words, pick a domain like mybl.domain.tld where you control domain.tld *or* if you don't control a domain of your own, then choose an invalid tld (e.g. "xyz" or "localdomain") and use a name like "bl.xyz" for your blacklist's domain. 2) Don't add it to "25_uribl.cf" where it will be overwritten by any upgrade; Instead put it in your local.cf (it will function the same way). Finally some advice that might help: Make sure that both you are using the DNS server you have configured the new domain on, and check that it is actually serving the new domain (e.g. "dig new_domain any @my_dns_server" and assuming *nix, that "my_dns_server" is the first listed in resolv.conf). It is probably more likely that you have an error in your zone file or name server config files than in the snippet of SA config above. Good luck, Paul Shupak track(a)plectere.com

1 0

How about uribl.com?
by Monty Ree 08 Jun '05

08 Jun '05

Hello,all. I have found that this site similar to SURBL. http://www.uribl.com/ Anyone who use this BL? How about this URIBL? Thanks in advance. _________________________________________________________________ 고.. 감.. 도.. 사.. 랑.. 만.. 들.. 기.. MSN 러브 http://www.msn.co.kr/love/

3 2

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] How about uribl.com?
by Chris Santerre 08 Jun '05

08 Jun '05

>-----Original Message----- >From: Bret Miller [mailto:bret.miller@wcg.org] >Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:24 AM >To: SURBL Discussion list >Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] How about uribl.com? > > >> I have found that this site similar to SURBL. >> >> http://www.uribl.com/ >> >> Anyone who use this BL? >> How about this URIBL? > >I hesitate to respond to this... URIBL is a good list like SURBL is a >good list. SURBL policies strive for a zero-false-positive list so it >can be used blindly to block e-mail. URIBL policies strive for a >zero-false-positive "black" list plus a sends-a-lot-of-spam but may hit >ham "grey" list. These are combined in a multi list so you >shouldn't use >multi to block e-mail. > >In addition, URIBL is really kind of in BETA stage right now. They are >working out the front-end details and I'm sure will soon announce their >existence and be included in a future version of SA. > >Bret LOL, I'm not saying anything. I was going to, but figured I'd wait to see what Jeff said. But since he has already replied to other thread, I guess he chooses to ignore this one ;) I love you Jeff. ;) --Chris

1 0

[question] my own surbl list?
by Monty Ree 08 Jun '05

08 Jun '05

Hello, all. I have operated SA 3.0.x with surbl.SURBL is best for me. and I would like to make my own surbl list for some reason. So I added zone below. but it seems that this doesn't work. zone "my.surbl.org" { type master; file "surbl/my.surbl.org.bind"; }; and added like below at 25_uribl.cf. urirhssub URIBL_MY_SURBL my.surbl.org. A 32 body URIBL_MY_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_MY_SURBL') describe URIBL_MY_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the MY SURBL blocklist tflags URIBL_MY_SURBL net What's the problem? Thanks in advance. What's _________________________________________________________________ 보다 빠르고 보기 편한 뉴스. 오늘의 화제는 MSN 뉴스에서 확인하세요. http://www.msn.co.kr/news/

2 1

20050605 embedded image spam
by Sean Sowell 05 Jun '05

05 Jun '05

Hello SURBL folks --- Thanks again for your help. Embedded image false negatives continue to drop. Below is a fresh list of dates and domains. I cleaned up the formatting and put each domain on a line. All times are Pacific (now GMT - 7). Will also begin uploading to the URIBL_BLACK and _GREY lists in a few moments (thank you Chris!). Kind regards, Sean S. PS: I keep .eml and .pdf copies of each of these if you need any. ===== 20050601-2349 saverzforyou2.info 20050602-1734 mediagroup.com 20050602-1734 searsappistream.com 20050602-1734 yourbillspaid.com 20050602-1816 consumersurveygroup.com 20050602-1816 internetsmartshopping.com 20050602-1816 shoppingsmarts.net 20050603-0116 consumerresearchcorporation.com 20050603-0116 mediagroup.com 20050603-0116 producttestpanel.com 20050603-0116 roastorianthembers.com 20050603-0155 golfshore.com 20050603-0346 consumerresearchcorporation.com 20050603-0346 mediagroup.com 20050603-0346 palpsenseateddy.com 20050603-0346 producttestpanel.com 20050603-0844 selfshopper.com 20050603-0844 techselfshopper.com 20050603-0903 thedealstouchdown.com 20050603-0903 touchdowndeals.com 20050603-1133 fortuneloungeplayersclub.com 20050603-1133 platinumplay.com 20050603-1133 saverzforyou2.info 20050603-1150 golfshore.com 20050603-1236 calmra.com 20050603-1239 besaway.com 20050603-1340 benderrickshawning.com 20050603-1340 mediagroup.com 20050603-1420 freehandbags.com 20050603-1420 qalba.com 20050603-1420 technologyengagement.com 20050603-1528 consumerresearchcorporation.com 20050603-1528 dicellostereopen.com 20050603-1528 mediagroup.com 20050603-1528 producttestpanel.com 20050603-1556 eahge.com 20050603-1556 eaifo.com 20050603-1556 igetnocredit.com 20050603-1556 implusemg.com 20050603-1625 clickbuyhappiness.com 20050603-1625 teqia.com 20050603-1714 consumerresearchcorporation.com 20050603-1714 mediagroup.com 20050603-1714 penternesternway.com 20050603-1714 producttestpanel.com 20050603-1745 jestersettlending.com 20050603-1745 maxmoolah.com 20050603-1745 mediagroup.com 20050603-1745 winhundred.com 20050603-2025 ptrak.com 20050603-2056 undershow.com 20050603-2150 ptrak.com 20050604-0852 undershow.com 20050604-0944 saverzforyou2.info 20050604-0944 superbrewards.com 20050604-1235 dentalismallergic.com 20050604-1235 mediagroup.com 20050604-1352 eaobs.com 20050604-1352 intelligencebarometer.com 20050604-1352 prizedistributors.com 20050604-1421 eatnh.com 20050604-1421 fcgdirect9.com 20050604-1421 justinthenick.com 20050604-1557 eaaun.com 20050604-1557 farfarawayplaces.com 20050604-1557 implusemg.com 20050604-1627 actmc.com 20050604-1627 kuaea.com 20050604-1627 readyforgoodtimes.com 20050604-1816 creditmethis.com 20050604-1816 dwnow.com 20050604-1816 yourgiftcards.com 20050604-1821 fortuneloungeplayersclub.com 20050604-1821 platinumplay.com 20050604-1821 saverzforyou2.info 20050604-1824 striveforsavings.com 20050604-1824 striveforsavingsnet.com 20050604-1831 overselfshopper.com 20050604-1831 selfshopper.com 20050605-0139 datdir.com 20050605-0139 rocketoffers.com

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Blogger attacks SURBL
by Chris Santerre 03 Jun '05

03 Jun '05

>-----Original Message----- >From: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions >[mailto:michele@blacknight.ie] >Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:05 AM >To: 'Jeff Chan'; 'SURBL Discussion list'; 'SpamAssassin Users' >Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Blogger attacks SURBL > > >discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org wrote: >> Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention. >> >> This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and >> as thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help >> us straighten him out, gently: >> >> http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/comments/blacklisting_blogs/ >> >> I gave it my shot. >> >> Jeff C. > >I love the way his blogging software leaves the email >addresses "naked" > >Mr Michele Neylon Actually they are encrypted in the web code, but decrypted for human readers. To me, thats about as secure as locking the door but leaving the windows open. --Chris

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] PayPal Joe-job
by Chris Santerre 03 Jun '05

03 Jun '05

>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] >Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 7:57 PM >To: Joe Wein >Cc: discuss(a)lists.surbl.org >Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] PayPal Joe-job > > >On Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 8:19:20 AM, Joe Wein wrote: >> Since I list a lot of fake company domains in >money-forwarding scams on my >> website (a data source of JP on multi.surbl.org), I seem to >have offended a >> few people. > >> Yesterday someone made 4 PayPal payments to my account, two >from the US, one >> from France and one from Australia. PayPal caught it or was >alerted and >> reversed all transfers, as well as suspending my account pending >> investigation. > >Hmm, I just got a paypal donation (first in months it seems) from >someone who has apparently never posted to any of the many spam >lists I'm on. Should I be concerned? Only if the amount ended in .37 cents :) --Chris

1 0

Strange Bounce [Was: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]
by Martin G. Diehl 03 Jun '05

03 Jun '05

Why would someone (for example, mailto:nico.prenzel@pn-systeme.de ) signup to an eMail list ... and then require authentication? Just curious ... IMO, if you don't want eMail, don't signup to an active eMail list. -------- Message With Full Headers -------- From: - Tue May 31 07:28:42 2005 X-UIDL: 1117523571.M110438P38333.mx6.oct X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 10000000 Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: mdiehl(a)nac.net Received: (qmail 38071 invoked by uid 0); 31 May 2005 07:12:36 -0000 Received: from 81.169.145.166 by mx6.oct (envelope-from <>, uid 0) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamuko: 0.72. Clear:RC:0(81.169.145.166):. Processed in 0.244881 secs); 31 May 2005 07:12:36 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: via mx6.oct X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:0(81.169.145.166):. Processed in 0.244881 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO natnoddy.rzone.de) (81.169.145.166) by rbl-mx6.oct.nac.net with SMTP; 31 May 2005 07:12:35 -0000 Received: from szpn0002 (p213.54.179.94.tisdip.tiscali.de [213.54.179.94]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4V7CXPC014589 for <mdiehl(a)nac.net>; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:12:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: by szpn0002 (Postfix) id 996CE474E0; Tue, 31 May 2005 09:05:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:05:26 +0200 (CEST) From: MAILER-DAEMON(a)szpn0002.pn-systeme.de (Mail Delivery System) Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: mdiehl(a)nac.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="04F23A26C6.1117523126/szpn0002" Message-Id: <20050531070526.996CE474E0@szpn0002> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on spamd2.oct X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-PrefsFile: nac.net/mdiehl X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.6 required=4.7 tests=RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100, RAZOR2_CHECK autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:05:26 +0200 (CEST) From: MAILER-DAEMON(a)szpn0002.pn-systeme.de (Mail Delivery System) To: mdiehl(a)nac.net This is the Postfix program at host szpn0002. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The Postfix program <nico.prenzel(a)pn-systeme.de>: host 192.168.101.1[192.168.101.1] said: 530 Authentication required (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Reporting-MTA: dns; szpn0002 X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 04F23A26C6 X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; mdiehl(a)nac.net Arrival-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:59:06 +0200 (CEST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; nico.prenzel(a)pn-systeme.de Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host 192.168.101.1[192.168.101.1] said: 530 Authentication required (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Subject: Re: Blogger attacks SURBL From: "Martin G. Diehl" <mdiehl(a)nac.net> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 02:02:20 -0400 To: Jeff Chan <jeffc(a)surbl.org> CC: SURBL Discuss <discuss(a)lists.surbl.org>, SpamAssassin Users <users(a)spamassassin.apache.org> Jeff Chan wrote: > Pardon the dramatic title, but hopefully it got your attention. > > This guy's domain got listed by Outblaze, we removed it, and as > thanks this guy paints us as irresponsible. Please help us > straighten him out, gently: > > http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/comments/blacklisting_blogs/ > > I gave it my shot. > > Jeff C. > -- > Don't harm innocent bystanders. The way I read his response is that he stands against SPAM and in favor of anti SPAM measures ... *provided* he is not inconvenienced. -- Martin

1 0

20050602 embedded image spam
by Sean Sowell 03 Jun '05

03 Jun '05

Hello SURBL folks --- Thank you so much for adding the last batch of submissions! Awesome! Reduced false negatives from those domains by more than half. Is it ok to submit a fresh list for consideration every couple of days? If so, feel free to make use of the domains below. If not, please disregard them or let me know a better way to do this. Am rather new at this SpamAssassin thing; that's how I discovered the SURBLs. I'm also trying to figure out how SA's "HTML_IMAGE_ONLY..." and "HTML_IMAGE_RATIO..." rules work and why much of this spam doesn't trip those sensors. Am reading up on pyzor/razor, dcc, and the njabl lists as well. Not sure yet if my host will let me install them. Kind regards, Sean S. PS: I keep .eml and .pdf copies of each of these. If you need any, let me know. ===== Tue, 31 May 2005 13:55:48 -0700 bondedselecterse.com and webnetworkers.com and mediagroup.com Tue, 31 May 2005 21:07:02 GMT kyouk.com and memolink.com and inthewildblueyonder.com Tue, 31 May 2005 21:48:17 GMT pbarn.com Tue, 31 May 2005 14:52:35 -0700 fantastickernest.com and mediagroup.com Tue, 31 May 2005 23:23:04 GMT luvbj.com Wed, 1 Jun 2005 03:57:03 +0400 (MSD) goste.biz Tue, 31 May 2005 15:08:41 -0700 clearcutsavings.com and clearcutsav.com Tue, 31 May 2005 17:58:08 -0700 saverzforyou2.info Tue, 31 May 2005 21:02:27 -0700 trustyingyanglearn.com and price-savers.com and mediagroup.com Tue, 31 May 2005 23:53:06 -0700 saverzforyou2.info Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:33:06 -0700 moringleaderboard.com and price-savers.com and mediagroup.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:27:13 -0700 cellotracketchupps.com and consumerincentivepromotions.com and mediagroup.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:49:01 GMT allgt.com and athleticprowess.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:19:35 GMT netderby.com and savingsderby.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:49:32 GMT mywapdealer.com and mydealdetective.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:57:38 -0500 en34.com and winfreestuff.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 22:54:09 GMT bijue.com and balancebucks.com Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:50:32 -0700 saverzforyou2.info Wed, 01 Jun 2005 23:24:19 GMT psdvn.com and shoptosmile.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:40:45 -0400 watchesei.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:10:47 -0700 clearcutsavings.com and ccs44.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:05:40 -0700 tramblentiling.com and giftfox.com and mediagroup.com Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:18:11 -0700 coolrushersheyday.com and producttestpanel.com and mediagroup.com Thu, 02 Jun 2005 00:02:56 -0700 datdir.com and localratesource.com and rocketoffers.com Thu, 02 Jun 2005 10:12:38 -0700 clearcutsavings.com and ccs44.com Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:28:30 -0700 vestuarynoplastic.com and mediagroup.com Thu, 02 Jun 2005 20:50:01 GMT rybyn.com and technologyengagement.com Thu, 02 Jun 2005 21:20:02 GMT k-rea.com and loanonme.com Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:35:31 -0500 en34.com and winfreestuff.com Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:25:03 GMT beank.com and connectedcircuit.com

1 0

FEC endorses selling of email addresses
by Matthew Wilson 02 Jun '05

02 Jun '05

Let's try that link again... http://chicagotribune.com/technology/chi-0505310158may31,1,5465703.story > "Draft rules from the Federal Election Commission, which enforces > campaign finance laws, would require that paid political > advertisements > on the Internet declare who funded the ad, as television spots do. > Similar disclaimers would be placed on political Web sites, as well as > on e-mails sent to people on purchased lists containing more than 500 > addresses."

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss