>...
>
>RM> ... more whitelist entries ...
>
>...
>
>whitelist_from_rcvd no.reply(a)1and1.com kundenserver.de # 1and1 Hosting & ISP
>http://survey.1and1.com
>
>...
>
I'm not so sure that 1&1 is immune from forgery, but if you
list it, you should also list the four domains oneandone.{com,net}
and 1und1.{com,net}. They are all the same company and forward
responses to abuse@ and to postmaster@ queries through the same
server (the problem is that *some* customer email also seems to go
through that server occasionally, and they have had abusive customers
in the past - so a forgery seems possible, even if unlikely).
Paul Shupak
track(a)plectere.com
Hello Jeff,
Saturday, May 28, 2005, 12:39:12 AM, you wrote:
JC> On Friday, May 27, 2005, 4:13:22 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
>> Friday, May 27, 2005, 1:06:46 AM, you wrote:
JC>>> On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 5:58:02 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
JC>>>>> 2. Would they be appropriate to whitelist (i.e. exclude from
JC>>>>> listing) in SURBLs?
>>>> Unlikely, since the web sites mentioned in the emails are rarely the
>>>> same as the From address or routing server. However, the primary web
>>>> sites within those emails might be good candidates for the SURBL
>>>> whitelist.
JC>>> Fair enough. You don't happen to have a list of those
JC>>> corresponding websites do you? :-)
>> Not readily handy, but if you can find me a few extra hours :-), I can
>> scan my corpus and put together a partial list.
JC> No rush, but if you can get them sometime that would be great!
JC> :-)
At the rate things are going, I'll never have the time needed to do a
full list. So maybe I can work through whitelist.cf line by line, and
send you a couple at a time, on occasion...
whitelist_from_rcvd *(a)ashkenaz.com roving.com Ashkenaz Music & Dance Community Center
In addition to http://ashkenaz.com, their emails have links to
http://ui.constantcontact.com
ConstantContact is occasionally abused, but is used by a lot of ham
newsletters, so probably should be whitelisted if not already.
whitelist_from_rcvd calmt(a)calmt.pmail.biz amsnet.com California Musical Theatre (Sacramento)
http://calmt.pmail.biz
whitelist_from_rcvd *(a)centurytheatres.com centurytheatres.com Century Theatres
http://www.centurytheatres.com and http://www.fandango.com
It's a start...
Bob Menschel
on Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:37:34AM -0700, Cricket Liu wrote:
> Hi, Tim. Hi, Steven.
>
> >On Jun 10, 2005, at 10:47 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
> >
> >>FYI - there's been some question about postsnet and campaigner lately
> >>on the SURBL whitelist list.
> >>
> >>Well, I was just subscribed to a postsnet list, managed by
> >>campaigner.
> >>
> >>If you go to the URL to unsub, including the final '.', you get a
> >>silly
> >>Javascript popup saying "Your work has been saved to date however
> >>your
> >>session has timed out and you must re-login", hit ok, get
> >>redirected to
> >>gotmarketing.com thence to campaigner.com.
>
> Hmm. I'm not sure why that is. I'll ask our Marketing folks to look
> into it.
Oh, that's really simple: the copy in the message thinks URLs are words,
not functional strings that should be bracketed or otherwise kept apart
from punctuation. I was merely remarking that a message ostensibly sent
via postsnet also involved campaigner.com and gomarketing, all of whom
have been on SURBL's radar lately. We've been trying to decide whether
the fact that "some" legitimate email refers to campaigner.com means
that we ought to whitelist it and let the rest of the spam through.
> >>Note that they explicitly say "we bought the list" below. I'm
> >>surprised
> >>to see Cricket Liu spamming. Guess I'll never buy another edition of
> >>_DNS and BIND_.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that.
I was extremely sorry to see that someone from whom I have learned so
much over the years would stoop to purchasing address lists in order to
spam people. Have you not been paying attention to the growing spam
problem? Here we reject 65-90% of /all inbound mail delivery attempts/
as spam, and it's getting worse. And mainstream companies who spam (or
who hire mainsleaze spam companies to spam for them) aren't helping
matters at /all/.
> >>My question is simple:
> >>
> >>Why did you subscribe me to this list without my permission? If
> >>you feel
> >>that you have permission from me to subscribe me to this list, may
> >>I ask
> >>where you think you got it? Is ORA cognizant/accepting of such stupid
> >>and/or risky practices by their authors?
>
> I'm not even sure which list "this list" is, but I'll forward your
> message to our Marketing folks and ask that, if we own this list, your
> address be deleted from it. If we simply bought the list, though,
> there's probably nothing we can do to delete you from the list.
If you own the list, I'd be very interested to hear how my address ended
up on it. You *do* maintain a log of all subscription requests, of
course, and can tell me when I subscribed, when I confirmed my
subscription (via an email sent to my address to confirm that the person
who subbed my address was actually /me/), from what IP address, on what
day and what time, etc, right?
If not, you're essentially looking to get yourself blacklisted. And
not just by SURBL or one of the other blacklists, but by a million
private blacklists around the world, who are a harder lot to scrub.
If you simply bought the list, you may want to familiarize yourself and
your marketing team with basic netiquette and guidelines for responsible
(as opposed to merely "legal") email marketing. It's 2005 - anyone
purchasing so-called "opt-in" lists in this day and age is begging to
get blacklisted and have their reputation tarnished.
I realize that if you purchased the list you probably can't get me
removed from the original - I've come to expect my address to be traded.
Frankly, I'm astounded to see someone as apparently net-savvy as you
just accepting the idea of purchasing mailing lists. I'm very, very
disappointed.
Steve
> Again, my apologies.
>
> cricket
--
hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
join us! http://hesketh.com/about/careers/account_manager.html join us!
FYI - there's been some question about postsnet and campaigner lately
on the SURBL whitelist list.
Well, I was just subscribed to a postsnet list, managed by campaigner.
If you go to the URL to unsub, including the final '.', you get a silly
Javascript popup saying "Your work has been saved to date however your
session has timed out and you must re-login", hit ok, get redirected to
gotmarketing.com thence to campaigner.com.
Note that they explicitly say "we bought the list" below. I'm surprised
to see Cricket Liu spamming. Guess I'll never buy another edition of
_DNS and BIND_.
I've Cc:'d Cricket as well as Tim O'Reilly, the publisher for Cricket's
book(s).
My question is simple:
Why did you subscribe me to this list without my permission? If you feel
that you have permission from me to subscribe me to this list, may I ask
where you think you got it? Is ORA cognizant/accepting of such stupid
and/or risky practices by their authors?
Steve
(ORA author/editor and owner of every edition of DNS and BIND except
the next one, if this crap continues...)
----- Forwarded message from Cricket Liu <cricket(a)infoblox.com> -----
X-EL-User-Policy: ASK
X-Received-From: Cricket_Liu_gzgrgz(a)postsnet.com
X-Delivered-To: <schampeo(a)hesketh.com>
X-Originating-IP: [69.28.223.137]
Received: from mta11br.postsnet.com (mta11br.postsnet.com [69.28.223.137])
by habanero.hesketh.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/20050406) with SMTP id j59M1gCt012350
for <schampeo(a)hesketh.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:02:10 -0400
X-EL-Offwhitelist: sent via mta11br.postsnet.com, occasional spam source
Message-ID: <13755331.1118354497825.KadaSegment.82.1(a)mta11br.postsnet.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:01:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Cricket Liu <cricket(a)infoblox.com>
Reply-To: "Cricket Liu" <Cricket_Liu_gzgrgz(a)postsnet.com>
To: schampeo(a)hesketh.com
Subject: Webinar: Active Directory Best Practices for DNS
Errors-To: Cricket_Liu_gzgrgz(a)postsnet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_574142_26711400.1118354497825"
Bounces-To: Cricket_Liu_gzgrgz(a)postsnet.com
X-Campaign: 494785.494149.458053786
X-Folder: Default
Content-Length: 16651
Lines: 386
WEBINAR: DNS BEST PRACTICES FOR BUILDING RESILIENT ACTIVE DIRECTORY INFRASTRUCTURE
Tuesday, June 28, 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM (PDT)
Register now...
http://postsnet.com/r.html?c=494785&r=494149&t=458053786&l=1&d=86127770&u=h…
Steve -
In our continuing Identity Experts Series, I'm pleased to announce that Infoblox is hosting a free webinar with NetPro, one of the industry's leading experts in Active Directory infrastructure management and a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner.
Microsoft's Active Directory is increasingly important to most enterprise networks. As such, it's critical to design and maintain AD system with maximum reliability in mind. A key component of a resilient AD infrastructure is an effective approach to deploying, maintaining, and monitoring DNS.
In this informative session, we will explore practical examples of modern DNS best practices that support nonstop AD services in the network.
DATES AND REGISTRATION
We will hold two sessions on Tuesday, June 28, at 9:00 am and 4:00 pm Pacific. To register for this event, please go to: http://postsnet.com/r.html?c=494785&r=494149&t=458053786&l=1&d=86127770&u=h…
(Space is limited, so reserve your seat as soon as possible.)
PARTICIPANTS
* Gil Kirkpatrick, Chief Technical Officer, NetPro, and author of MacMillan USA's Active Directory Programming, is a renowned expert on enterprise directories and is a 2005 recipient of Microsoft's MVP Award.
* Cricket Liu, VP of Architecture, Infoblox, and author of O'Reilly & Associates' DNS and BIND, DNS & BIND Cookbook, and DNS On Windows Server 2003, is an expert on Domain Name System architecture, services, and deployment.
* Rick Kagan, VP of Marketing, Infoblox, is an industry expert on securing business networks and developing network identity infrastructure.
I hope you can join us! If you have any questions, please contact us at events(a)infoblox.com.
Thanks, Cricket
Register now...
http://postsnet.com/r.html?c=494785&r=494149&t=458053786&l=1&d=86127770&u=h…
You are receiving this email because you have requested information from us in the past, have requested information from one of our trusted partners, or are a member of a list that we have purchased. If you would like to change your communications preferences or no longer recieve mailings from Infoblox, please contact us at mailings(a)infoblox.com or write us at Infoblox, 475 Potrero Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94085 USA.
You are subscribed as schampeo(a)hesketh.com. To unsubscribe please click here: http://postsnet.com/r.html?c=494785&r=494149&t=458053786&l=6&ea=schampeo@he….
----- End forwarded message -----
--
hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
join us! http://hesketh.com/about/careers/account_manager.html join us!
>...
>Hello, all.
>
>I have operated SA 3.0.x with surbl.SURBL is best for me.
>and I would like to make my own surbl list for some reason.
>
>So I added zone below. but it seems that this doesn't work.
>
> zone "my.surbl.org" {
> type master;
> file "surbl/my.surbl.org.bind";
> };
>
>and added like below at 25_uribl.cf.
>
>urirhssub URIBL_MY_SURBL my.surbl.org. A 32
>body URIBL_MY_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_MY_SURBL')
>describe URIBL_MY_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the MY SURBL
>blocklist
>tflags URIBL_MY_SURBL net
>
>
>What's the problem?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>What's
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>ºžŽÙ ºüž£°í ºž±â ÆíÇÑ Žºœº. ¿ÀŽÃÀÇ ÈÁŠŽÂ MSN Žºœº¿¡Œ È®ÀÎÇÏŒŒ¿ä.
>http://www.msn.co.kr/news/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
Two problems that probably won't answer your question.
1) You should not try to be authoritative for a subdomain of
someone else's domain (i.e. surbl.org) unless they delegate it to you.
In other words, pick a domain like mybl.domain.tld where you
control domain.tld *or* if you don't control a domain of your own, then
choose an invalid tld (e.g. "xyz" or "localdomain") and use a name like
"bl.xyz" for your blacklist's domain.
2) Don't add it to "25_uribl.cf" where it will be overwritten
by any upgrade; Instead put it in your local.cf (it will function the
same way).
Finally some advice that might help: Make sure that both you
are using the DNS server you have configured the new domain on, and
check that it is actually serving the new domain (e.g. "dig new_domain
any @my_dns_server" and assuming *nix, that "my_dns_server" is the first
listed in resolv.conf). It is probably more likely that you have an error
in your zone file or name server config files than in the snippet of SA
config above.
Good luck,
Paul Shupak
track(a)plectere.com
Hello,all.
I have found that this site similar to SURBL.
http://www.uribl.com/
Anyone who use this BL?
How about this URIBL?
Thanks in advance.
_________________________________________________________________
고.. 감.. 도.. 사.. 랑.. 만.. 들.. 기.. MSN 러브
http://www.msn.co.kr/love/
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bret Miller [mailto:bret.miller@wcg.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:24 AM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] How about uribl.com?
>
>
>> I have found that this site similar to SURBL.
>>
>> http://www.uribl.com/
>>
>> Anyone who use this BL?
>> How about this URIBL?
>
>I hesitate to respond to this... URIBL is a good list like SURBL is a
>good list. SURBL policies strive for a zero-false-positive list so it
>can be used blindly to block e-mail. URIBL policies strive for a
>zero-false-positive "black" list plus a sends-a-lot-of-spam but may hit
>ham "grey" list. These are combined in a multi list so you
>shouldn't use
>multi to block e-mail.
>
>In addition, URIBL is really kind of in BETA stage right now. They are
>working out the front-end details and I'm sure will soon announce their
>existence and be included in a future version of SA.
>
>Bret
LOL, I'm not saying anything. I was going to, but figured I'd wait to see
what Jeff said. But since he has already replied to other thread, I guess he
chooses to ignore this one ;)
I love you Jeff. ;)
--Chris
Hello, all.
I have operated SA 3.0.x with surbl.SURBL is best for me.
and I would like to make my own surbl list for some reason.
So I added zone below. but it seems that this doesn't work.
zone "my.surbl.org" {
type master;
file "surbl/my.surbl.org.bind";
};
and added like below at 25_uribl.cf.
urirhssub URIBL_MY_SURBL my.surbl.org. A 32
body URIBL_MY_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_MY_SURBL')
describe URIBL_MY_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the MY SURBL
blocklist
tflags URIBL_MY_SURBL net
What's the problem?
Thanks in advance.
What's
_________________________________________________________________
보다 빠르고 보기 편한 뉴스. 오늘의 화제는 MSN 뉴스에서 확인하세요.
http://www.msn.co.kr/news/