On Friday, September 24, 2004, 8:51:52 AM, Mariano Absatz wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:58:42 -0700, Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
[...]
76.754 78.9448 0.0178 1.000 0.80 0.00 URIBL_OB_SURBL 77.230 79.4340 0.0208 1.000 0.60 1.00 URIBL_PJ_SURBL
[...]
82.119 84.4600 0.1367 0.998 0.40 0.00 URIBL_WS_SURBL
Do you have a current reasonable scoring for jp? (that is, considering that, for now, this score will be added to the ws score, since, until SA3.1, jp will be a subset of ws.
Since OB and JP have about the same spam detection and false positive rates, their scores should probably be somewhat similar.
Not sure what to recommend in terms of scoring JP as added to WS, but JP should probably be scored higher than WS.
Cheers,
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."