"David Hooton" david.hooton@gmail.com wrote:
Received: from mx2.mailsecurity.net.au (mx2.mailsecurity.net.au
[67.18.110.234])
by corp.mailsecurity.net.au (8.12.11/3.0.0) with ESMTP id i81It2vK027557 for xxx@xxx.xxx.au; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 04:55:10 +1000 Received: from 67.18.110.234 ([61.145.73.222]) by mx2.mailsecurity.net.au (2.52a) with SMTP id i81IrkFI002376 for xxx@xxx.xxx.au; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 04:53:49 +1000
inetnum: 61.145.73.208 - 61.145.73.223 netname: SANSHUI-JLB-LTD country: CN descr: SANSHUI JIANLIBAO CO.,LTD
X-Message-Info: HGKVBW2ciaONIbIZry4u281+RKcvq898uozZX
This means the remaining Received lines are bogus.
Hmm... Why would a Russian spammer have to use a Chinese spam server?
----6546910835501891 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Best forum about mailing and spam Get involved today! http://www.cyberpolice-MUNGED.ru
This text smells like a Joe job to me. It's too short and too boring.
Joe