----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" raymond@prolocation.net To: rob@pvsys.com; "SURBL Discussion list" discuss@lists.surbl.org Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 10:32 AM Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] SURBL WS test scores in SA 3.0
Hi!
For example, obviously, there are going to be many Fortune 500 companies
who
will get away with the worst kinds of harvesting of e-mails from web
sites
for spamming. Surely, most of the time, their legal departments will
prevent
this because their "deep pockets" cannot afford to pursue such risky business practices. But in the event that one DOES do this, we would obviously not want to include them in SURBL, even with their bad
behavior.
What are your thoughts about leveling the lists, so for example we can make a new evil.surbl.org, where we also state 'dont use this at home, unless...' then we can shift those 'grey area domains' to the new list and we all can be happy.
There will be more and more trying to be gray, and its not like a hardcore spammer can send out 1 legit mailing and be whitelisted all at once...
Supported.... I'd even say ws.subrl.org should be this list..... and let spamcop and the rest be more lenient. Adding another list would probably just complicate the choice, while making ws. (if Bill approves) the more strict list, users have the choice to set their score accordingly.
Alex