OK I was away from email for a while, but if this domain has legitimate uses, then we probably should not list it, by our own rules.
Yes, he did buy an unclean list from spammers. Yes, he did send spam using it. Yes, he did violate U.S. and E.U. laws. Yes, he has no legal grounds at all to sue anyone since he admits to violating these laws by admitting to spamming. Yes, he is a spammer.
But that's not the question. The question is: does the domain have legitimate uses. If so we shouldn't list it. We should not list domains that have legitimate uses, even if they do send in some spam.
Unfortunately many people will probably not understand this position or approve of it, and some will misinterpret it as "caving in to spammers," but in reality it's simply applying our own rules consistently. (To those people I would say you do not understand what we are doing.)
What I need to know is: do they have legitimate uses: yes or no?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."