On Saturday, September 4, 2004, 2:01:05 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
How about www.senderbase.org ?
I would not go that way, people can test on senderbase/bonded sender, and just like habaes this will be abused also. In my SA setup the above scores are also taken, and will bias the score...
Are any of them grey? Bonded sender claims they have paid out only tiny amounts of bonds due to violations.
Remember that not everyone uses SA. I'd like to have a list of non-spammers to exclude from SURBLs.
I have requested rsync access on the zones, they have responded to that and we will setup a feed, afterwards i can have a look on the zones, and check a little better. More indepth...
Sounds perfectly reasonable. We can check if any of their customers hit our lists.
Are there any other nominally whitehatting organizations we could check into? Are there any real whitehat certification groups?
What is senderbase?
Jeff C.