I submitted from Ryan's submission. But I did check it and it looked spammy. Also had a bunch of NANAS hits, and not just one.
I see a pattern of legit sites possibly being con'd by sleezy marketers. Causing them to be listed. It will probably happen in the future despite our best efforts. We can minimise of course.
But if the domain is unfamiliar, looks kind of spammy (cdbaby, come one now!), has multiple NANAS or NANAE hits, is reported to be spamming, then most likely it will get listed.
I had no doubts when I listed this. I'm still only going by what Jeff has said. But I don't go by what companies quote on there website. Everything Jeff quoted I've seen before on known spam sites.
If a site has multiple reports on NANAS, from different people, over a stretch of time, then you bet it sends red flags up for me!
I removed then and will update file.
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:08 PM To: SURBL Discuss Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] cdbaby.com fp whitelisted
cdbaby.com was on ws. I've whitelisted it along with a couple others:
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss