On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 03:43:19PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, April 27, 2004, 3:13:48 PM, Simon Byrnand wrote:
Just spotted the following redirected URL in a spam. Doesn't look like it will be getting caught yet with the current redirector rules:
http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=gmib.free.fr/viagra.jpg&imgrefurl=...
Using images.google.ca as a redirector ? Thats a new one.... I'm not game to click on the link to see where it goes though... its from the same spammer that was blatently abusing the yahoo redirectors and msn ones...
Is this a sign that the current system used in SpamCopURI (checking HTTP responses of specifically mentioned redirectors) is just going to play catchup all the time ?
I think this would be caught by the urirhsbl approach of splitting all the visible URIs in a redirection URI then checking them all.
Perhaps SpamCopURI would need a conf change to add images.google.ca?
Hmm. I would add it, but it doesn't actually seem to work as a redirector.
--eric
Jeff C.
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss