On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 1:40:05 AM, Frank Johansen wrote:
Hi, I'm in the progress of upgrading SA from 2.63 to 2.64 and SpamCopURI from 0.19 to 0.22.
The syntax for the SpamCopURI 0.22 rules is new to reflect use of the combined list multi.surbl.org, so please update them to look like these. Also please add two lists, AB and JP, to the 0.22 configs:
uri SPAMCOP_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+2') describe SPAMCOP_URI_RBL Has URI in SC at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html tflags SPAMCOP_URI_RBL net
uri WS_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+4') describe WS_URI_RBL Has URI in WS at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html tflags WS_URI_RBL net
uri PH_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+8') describe PH_URI_RBL Has URI in PH at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html tflags PH_URI_RBL net
uri OB_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+16') describe OB_URI_RBL Has URI in OB at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html tflags OB_URI_RBL net
uri AB_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+32') describe AB_URI_RBL Has URI in AB at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html tflags AB_URI_RBL net
uri JP_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+64') describe JP_URI_RBL Has URI in JP at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html tflags JP_URI_RBL net
score SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 4.0 score WS_URI_RBL 1.5 score PH_URI_RBL 3.0 score OB_URI_RBL 2.2 score AB_URI_RBL 3.0 score JP_URI_RBL 2.5
Please remove any old rules referring to lists other than multi.surbl.org (i.e. sc.surbl.org, ws.surbl.org should no longer be used since they're in multi now).
Hope this helps,
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."