On Monday, September 20, 2004, 3:20:52 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
Please test the MailPolice Fraud list as Bill described earlier (copied below). We would like to include this data in our PH anti-phishing list, but request your help in testing it first.
We're particularly interested in any false positives.
Jeff C. __
This is a list that MailPolice hosts and I have been running it for a few hours and it has already flagged some phish and fraud e-mails. Here is some info about the list: http://rhs.mailpolice.com/#rhsfraud
This is my configuration for SA 2.64 with the SpamCopURI plug-in:
uri MP_URI_RBL eval:check_spamcop_uri_rbl('fraud.rhs.mailpolice.com','127.0.0.2') describe MP_URI_RBL URI's domain appears in MailPolice fraud list tflags MP_URI_RBL net score MP_URI_RBL 2.0
And for SA 3.0 with the URIDNSBL plug-in:
urirhsbl URIBL_MP fraud.rhs.mailpolice.com. A header URIBL_MP eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_MP') describe URIBL_MP URI's domain appears in MailPolice fraud list tflags URIBL_MP net score URIBL_MP 2.0
Bill
Does anyone have any more testing of the fraud.rhs.mailpolice.com data to share?
SpamAssassin corpus checkers, would you please test it for FPs?
Shall we add it to ph.surbl.org?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."