On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 2:10:29 PM, David Funk wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
I stripped the header for this discussion. Is this a spam domain or an attempt to poison SURBL. It is obviously a spam, but is domain bogus?
-----Original Message-----
*SNIP*
[snip..]
href=3D"http://hesatosser.com.info/?wid=3D100005%22%3EH= ERE</a><br><br>
[snip..]
<a href=3D"http://hesatosser.com.info/?wid=3D100005%22%3E Get it now
[snip..]
href=3D"http://http://hesatosser.com.com/nomore.html%22%3EGo here</a> to stop=
Neither, it's broken spam-ware. The actual pill-spam-site is "hesatosser .com" (which is listed in SURBL ;).
I agree. Probably user error in using spamware, or coding problems in it.
"*.com.com" is a valid domain name, belongs to CNet, clearly not spam. "*.com.info" isn't even a valid domain at all.
Yep, and com.com and most other cnet domains we could find are already whitelisted.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."