20 Sep
2004
20 Sep
'04
10:49 a.m.
In message 414E1038.3A78@xyzzy.claranet.de, Frank Ellermann writes:
Jeff Chan wrote:
But me might also lean towards taking JP out of WS if we do this (i.e., no WS+JP).
That's what I wanted to say, treat both as independent sets:
WS = only WS (multi 127.0.0.4), JP = only JP (multi 127.0.0.64)
The last available multi bit / set / list is then 128 (bit 7).
Shouldn't it be possible to use the second and third field as well? For example, multi 127.0.1.0 for an eightth list? Of course, some code would need changes...
But then, my knowledge of IP addressing is less than perfect, so I might be wrong. :-)
//Christer
--
| Sys admin @ MEDIC WWW: http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/ |
| Email: mort@dtek.chalmers.se Phone: (0)31 772 5431, (0)707 53 57 57 |
"I fought the loa and the loa won, I fought the loa and the loa won..."
-- Dave Aronsson, a.s.r.