27 Jul
2004
27 Jul
'04
8:36 a.m.
Jeff Chan wrote:
If you list MailScanner you might as well list Amavis and all the other fancy ways of calling SA.
Thanks for your feedback Daniel. To be honest, I'm not familiar with MailScanner. Does MailScanner include or depend on SA? The main reason I was aware of MailScanner is that I heard from some users that they were using SURBLs.
Jeff C.
http://mailscanner.info MailScanner doesn't include or depend on SA (without SA one can still check for viruses and do old fashioned RBL lookups), but the only way to have MailScanner check SURBLs is to utilize its ability to call SA 2.63 + SpamCopURI or SA 3.0.
Daniel