28 Sep
2004
28 Sep
'04
3:43 a.m.
On Monday, September 27, 2004, 6:12:41 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
In another message about doubleclick you came to the conclusion to whitelist this stuff. IMHO that's a bad idea. There's no reason to whitelist somebody known for utter dubious business practices: as long as they don't spam they won't show up in a SURBL, why waste your time or bandwidth for these [censored] ?
Doubleclick domains show up in a lot of hams. Do we want to block those hams?
Yes or no?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."