Hello,
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, November 15, 2004, 12:50:09 PM, Jose Cruz wrote:
If some entries were found at WS and SC, this means that they aren't at MULTI.
Why ? There may be a race condition : as multi is created from other bls, it may be possible that when I rsync, SC and WS where already updated but not MULTI.
WS updates approximately the same time as multi. SC updates more often than multi. In future versions, these will all be internally synchronized.
I rsync data every two hours. It could be interesting to change periodicity and see what happens.
You should rsync a lot more often, at least once an hour.
I'll do it ! And I'll remove other bls already included in multi.
So far, here is a comment I've just received about integrating surbl into j-chkmail.
But Dennis shall note that I did the effort of integrating surbl into j-chkmail, but the great work of surbl comes from Jeff, Chris, Raymond and others.
I agree with Dennis. From all content checking spam detection methods, that one which seems to give less false positive rate is urlbl, no doubt about it.
*************************
Since I use only the left hand side (domains) having that as a separate file would reduce the load I creat even further. The Urlbl list is the most effective method of content filtering I've used so far and I like it a lot. Thanks for building this into the product.
Dennis
**************************
Best,
Jose-Marcio
Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss