Eric Kolve wrote:
Okay, I see what you are saying. Would you then end up with something like this:
perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-patched-2.63-1.i386.rpm perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-SpamCopURI-0.14-1.i386.rpm
pretty much, I'd likely do it via a virtual package such that:
perl-Mail-SpamAssassin provides "SpamCopURI-patched"
and perl-spamassassin-SpamCopURI requires a SpamCopURI-patched version of perl-Mail-SpamAssassin.
Then it's just a case of beating up the various packagers to include the patch etc.
Regards,
Rob