Jeff Chan wrote:
Bill and Rob are right: we don't publish the SURBL whitelist.
Oops, I didn't know that, I've bookmarked the WL-hit link for this purpose.
Checking my public links I found that http://surbl.org doesn't work anymore, or maybe it never worked, I'll add the missing "www." asap.
http://multi.surbl.org also has no IP, that's bad, it should be an alias of www.surbl.org, and ideally your Web server should redirect it to a page like lists.html explaining what "multi" is, or to a page explaining the removal procedure.
That's still best current practice for all WLs and BLs, see http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-01.txt
| Most DNSxLs also contain an A record at the DNSxL's name that | points to a web server, so that anyone wishing to learn about | the bad.example.net DNSBL can check http://bad.example.net.
Yes, the ASRG draft expired, but IMHO it's technically okay.
Bye, Frank