That is precisely why I did say, "in case my terminology is not quite technically accurate"... I had a feeling it wasn't!!!
But I'm not so sure I'm unconfused yet by Stephen's explanation... perhaps I'm now **less** confused :) But thanks, Stephen, I do need all the help I can get!
Still... back to my original question, does anyone know of a "clearinghouse" list of such abuser's who, by definition, will never get explicitly listed in SURBL?
Rob McEwen