Truthfully, I was looking for something a bit more conservative that still reflected the possibility of a false-positive here and there ;-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Spam Admin" spam_admin@sil.org To: "SURBL Discussion list" discuss@lists.surbl.org Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:22 AM Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Question about scoring in SA3
I have my rules set as this:
score URIBL_AB_SURBL 50
Thus, no matter what mode you are running in, SA scores this rule 50
points. Put these in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or other .cf file in this folder.
Dan Zachary
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I've been very pleased with SURBL in SA3 and I'd like to increase the scores. However, I don't understand how the default scores like this
work:
rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_AB_SURBL 0 2.007 0 0.417 rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_OB_SURBL 0 1.996 0 3.213 rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_PH_SURBL 0 0.839 0 2.000 rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_SC_SURBL 0 3.897 0 4.263 rules/50_scores.cf:score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 0.539 0 1.462
I feel SA is being too conservative with the resource that SURBL
provides.
Can anyone give me their recommendations for my local configuration file
for
replacement scores that will be more effective?
And since I couldn't find it referenced, can anyone tell me what the four numbers after the score mean?
Regards, KAM
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss