It looks like this is due to rd.yahoo.com implementing a signature associated with each redirect so anything that depended on that redirector (open_redirect.t) will fail. I will fix this and hopefully release shortly...
--eric
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 01:24:03PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
This is a forwarded message From: SRH-Lists giermo@333tech.com To: Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org Date: Monday, July 19, 2004, 1:19:36 PM Subject: More on SpamCopURI busting tests
===8<==============Original message text===============
Hmm. I disagree. For three of the machines, I _know_ there is no port 80 blocking.
It might be useful if you could show us which tests are failing, but I assume it's the same redirection-handling ones that other people have mentioned.
Yup. Same set:
t/blacklist........ok t/dnsrbl...........ok t/extract_urls.....ok t/mailto...........ok t/open_redirect....# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 37) t/open_redirect....NOK 1# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 44) t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 52) t/open_redirect....ok 4/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5. t/open_redirect....dubious Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300) Scalar found where operator expected at (eval 152) line 1, near "'int' $__val" (Missing operator before $__val?) DIED. FAILED tests 1-3 Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay t/spamcopuri.......ok t/whitelist........ok
Just adding my "I get the exact same failed tests, no, port 80 is not blocked and, yes, it seems to work if I force install it"
-steve
===8<===========End of original message text===========
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss