Re: [SURBL-Discuss] First attempt to subvert surbl approach ? :)

At 12:30 22/04/2004, you wrote:

Just browsing through my spam folder and noticed a spam with the following URL:

[URL snipped]

(without the -munged of course)

Well that blew up in my face. My own SpamAssassin running SpamCopURI-0.12 (and the redirect parser enabled) picked that URL up despite my attempt to mung it, and matched it against both sc and ws :) Fortunately BAYES_00 was enough to prevent it from actually being blocked, but possibly some of you out there may have blocked it...

I can see one disadvantage to surbl - it makes it pretty hard to discuss the domain names of spammers ;)

Regards, Simon