On Monday, October 25, 2004, 1:23:32 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org]
If we're thinking about setting up a blog list (as we were earlier), then it might be useful to test the data before using it, don't you agree?
I don't see how dumping lists with arbitrary FPs onto UC helps either UC or SURBLs. In fact it's one of the bad things we predicted: that a grey list would become a dumping ground with some FPs and some domains that belong on a blocklist, all sitting there underclassified, unchecked or ignored.
They are NOT going unchecked. UC is still in beta form right now. So we are testing. Most people have no clue where the server is as it is NOT part of SURBL, so UC.SURBL.ORG doesn't work. Not a dumping ground at all. It will be as active as WS.
I fully intend to mirror most of what goes into WS into UC. UC will simply have a different policy. Grey domains need to be considered. UC will do that. You said yourself earlier you didn't want to be any part of a list that handled grey domains. That it would waste time. So you don't have to worry about UC.
UC will get as much attention to detail as I put into WS. I just won't delete grey domains, like I do now. I will instead list then in UC.
How about a blog spam SURBL? Or is all blog spam grey?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."