On Thursday, July 29, 2004, 6:12:52 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Thursday, July 29, 2004, 11:11:40 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Out of 2200 domains in the list around 800 are 'new' ones, but it seems they are either dead or old :) (read, not used in spam anymore?)
Yes, too I found that 1424 of the 2200 or so entries from MailSecurity's data are also on ws.surbl.org. That sounds to me like the new ones should get added to ws.
But if some of those "new" ones are dead or old, we should ask David to prune them from the data first.
I'll probably remove ms.surbl.org in a few days, hoping people will do some more testing.
Since Raymond is now folding the MailSecurity data into ws.surbl.org, and the overlap with WS is large, I'm going to go ahead and remove the ms.surbl.org list in a few days unless there are any major objections.
Jeff C.