-----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss- bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Chan Sent: Tuesday, 4 May 2004 7:16 PM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Proposal to add some anti-phishing data to SURBL
It's pretty certain we will want to do a combined list of at least ws and sc. As an alternative to Bill merging a phishing list into ws, we could add it to a combined list and *not* have it as a small, separate list. (In other words it would obly be available in a combined list.) If we do the latter we could probably give it a unique result value.
Either way is possible (i.e. merge into ws, or merge into a combined list.):
- Merge into ws: probably no specific code for phishing
- Merge into combined list: could have a separate code
2a. (With no separate list for phishing if it's small.)
I personally think 2 is the preferred option as it provides domain & netblock owners with a possible means of becoming unlisted. Further helping us remove false positives and mopped up incidents as soon as we can.
As far as creating additional SURBL's go, I think the less lists kept overall the better, it's much kinder on bandwidth & end users system performance.
Cheers,
Dave
======================================================================== Pain free spam & virus protection by: www.mailsecurity.net.au Forward undetected SPAM to: spam@mailsecurity.net.au ========================================================================