Re: [SURBL-Discuss] FP rate?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Theo Van Dinter writes:

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:43:35PM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:

...

Oh I agree. I don't know what is causing it, but I know it must be throwing off the reported FP rate. Although proably for all the URIRBLs. I'd love to get a monthly report from DQ on his rates. But I know he is busy.

All our mass-check results are available via anonymous rsync. Feel free to generate some statistics. ;)

This could be tested quite easily, if anyone has the tuits...

1. do a network mass-check of the SURBL rules. 2. restart named, in case it's a named-cache issue (unlikely) 3. do another with exactly the same corpus. 4. diff the logs.

- --j.