On Sunday, January 30, 2005, 5:14:38 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
Considering that SA hasn't shipped with JP yet and that those hosts are already caught in WS (which predates JP), I'd announce that you're making the change in a week and then make the change.
btw, I think requiring people to upgrade ASAP isn't necessarily a great idea; we can avoid it by setting up a new BL for "WS minus JP". then 3.1.0 can look up
- JP
- WS_minus_JP
and existing clients can look up
- WS (which includes JP as before)
and upgrade at their leisure...
What about:
The seperate zonefile will contain both (WS+JP)
The multi list, since those seem to can use multi anyway, has the seperated sources.
Bye, Raymond.
I'm opposed to creating new lists like this.
Besides, if we're going to ask people to add rules to their 3.0.x, we can just ask them to add:
urirhssub URIBL_JP_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 64 body URIBL_JP_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_JP_SURBL') describe URIBL_JP_SURBL Has URI in JP at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html tflags URIBL_JP_SURBL net
score URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.0
Right? ;-)
Jeff C.