9 Dec
2004
9 Dec
'04
3:02 a.m.
On Wednesday, December 8, 2004, 9:33:46 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
Chris Santerre wrote:
Well we have talked about it and .... didn't come up with a solid answer. The idea would cause more lookups and time for those who don't cache dns. We do have a whitelist that our private research tools do poll. The idea is that if it isn't in SURBL then it is white.
This also puts more work to the already overworked contributors. ;)
want to put me on the round robin list again?
Alex is referring to SURBL public name service delegations. Yes, I can add your name server back if it can take 200k bits per second of traffic.
Let me know if that's ok.
I think Chris and Dallas were referring to something else.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."