Rob McEwen wrote to SURBL Discussion list:
Good idea. Let's do it. I'll be able to submit more domains to *this* list than I could to ws. It will finally give meaning to that pile of domains I always end up with and get ulcers trying to classify as black or white.
For the record... and just to be sure... I vote that unconfirmed.surbl.org NOT contain those things that we tend to agree with as NOT being spam, but sometimes gets reported as spam by end users.
Yes, I really hope that's the general idea. I see uc.surbl.org as a place for those domains that we're *almost* sure are spam, but we can't (yet) take a strong enough stand to blacklist them outright.
Otherwise, the list won't have much value at all.
I say, let's set it up for development purposes as conservatively as we can, submit to it for a week or two, and then run some mass-checks (or equivalent) to see how it performs, and make policy adjustments accordingly.
- Ryan